Abstract:Background: Existing instruments measuring participation may vary with respect to various aspects. This study aimed to examine the comparability of existing instruments measuring participation based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) by considering aspects of content, the perspective adopted and the categorization of response options.Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify instruments that have been commonly used to measure participation. Concepts of identified instruments were then linked to the ICF following the refined ICF Linking Rules. Aspects of content, perspective adopted and categorization of response options were documented.Results: Out of 315 instruments identified in the full-text screening, 41 instruments were included. Concepts of six instruments were linked entirely to the ICF component Activities and Participation; of 10 instruments still 80% of their concepts. A descriptive perspective was adopted in most items across instruments (75%), mostly in combination with an intensity rating. An appraisal perspective was found in 18% and questions from a need or dependency perspective were least frequent (7%).Conclusion: Accounting for aspects of content, perspective and categorization of responses in the linking of instruments to the ICF provides detailed information for the comparison of instruments and guidance on narrowing down the choices of suitable instruments from a content point of view.<ul class="NLM_list NLM_list-list_type-simple"><li class="IN_LIST-title">Implications for Rehabilitation</li><li>For clinicians and researchers who need to identify a specific instrument for a given purpose, the findings of this review can serve as a screening tool for instruments measuring participation in terms of the following:</li><li>• Their content covered based on the ICF.</li><li>• The perspective adopted in the instrument (e.g., descriptive, need/dependency or appraisal).</li><li>• The categorization of their response options (e.g., intensity or frequency).</li></ul>

Applying Rasch analysis to transforming scores on the activities and participation component of the ICF Rehabilitation Set: A multicenter study

Psychometric Properties of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set: a Rasch Analysis.

Activities of Daily Living Measurement after Ischemic Stroke Rasch Analysis of the Modified Barthel Index

Rasch Analysis of the Body Function Component of the ICF Rehabilitation Set in Functional Assessment of Orthopedic Patients

Rasch Analysis of the Qualifier Response Options of the ICF Set for Spinal Cord Injury Nursing

Psychometric Properties of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Set for Spinal Cord Injury Nursing Based on Rasch Analysis

The Reliability and Validity of the "activity and Participation" Component in the Brief ICF Core Set for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Based on Rasch Analysis.

Using a Mobile App-Based International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Set to Assess the Functioning of Spinal Cord Injury Patients: Rasch Analysis.

Simplified Post-stroke Functioning Assessment Based on ICF via Dichotomous Mokken Scale Analysis and Rasch Modeling

Interpreting results from Rasch analysis 1. The "most likely" measures coming from the model

Assessing Clinically Important Differences During Rehabilitation for Stroke: A Pilot Study Evaluating Anchor and Distribution Derived Estimates of Physical Function Change in Classically Summed and Rasch Models of Section GG of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment Instrument

Agreement Between Single Raters and Team Rating when Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health’s Rehabilitation Set

Application of ICF Disability Set in Evaluation of Therapeutic Effect among Inpatients in Neurology Department

Rasch Analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory for Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation

Interpreting results from Rasch analysis 2. Advanced model applications and the data-model fit assessment

Establishing score equivalence of the GDS-30 scale and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health range, using Rasch analysis

Using the refined ICF Linking Rules to compare the content of existing instruments and assessments: a systematic review and exemplary analysis of instruments measuring participation

A TEAM APPROACH TO APPLYING THE INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH REHABILITATION SET IN CLINICAL EVALUATION

Value of Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health for Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment

Rater Experience Influences Reliability and Validity of the Brief International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Set for Stroke.

Promote the Application of the International Classification of Functioning， Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation