Abstract:Background context: There is no outcome instrument specifically designed and validated for spine trauma patients without complete paralysis, which makes it difficult to compare outcomes of different treatments of the spinal column injury within and between studies. Purpose: The paper aimed to report on the evidence-based consensus process that resulted in the selection of core International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) categories, as well as the response scale for use in a universal patient-reported outcome measure for patients with traumatic spinal column injury. Study design/setting: The study used a formal decision-making and consensus process. Patient sample: The sample includes patients with a primary diagnosis of traumatic spinal column injury, excluding completely paralyzed and polytrauma patients. Outcome measures: The wide array of function and health status of patients with traumatic spinal column injury was explored through the identification of all potentially meaningful ICF categories. Methods: A formal decision-making and consensus process integrated evidence from four preparatory studies. Three studies aimed to identify relevant ICF categories from three different perspectives. The research perspective was covered by a systematic literature review identifying outcome measures focusing on the functioning and health of spine trauma patients. The expert perspective was explored through an international web-based survey among spine surgeons from the five AOSpine International world regions. The patient perspective was investigated in an international empirical study. A fourth study investigated various response scales for their potential use in the future universal outcome instrument. This work was supported by AOSpine. AOSpine is a clinical division of the AO Foundation, an independent medically guided non-profit organization. The AOSpine Knowledge Forums are pathology-focused working groups acting on behalf of AOSpine in their domain of scientific expertise. Results: Combining the results of the preparatory studies, the list of ICF categories presented at the consensus conference included 159 different ICF categories. Based on voting and discussion, 11 experts from 6 countries selected a total of 25 ICF categories as core categories for patient-reported outcome measurement in adult traumatic spinal column injury patients (9 body functions, 14 activities and participation, and 2 environmental factors). The experts also agreed to use the Numeric Rating Scale 0-100 as response scale in the future universal outcome instrument. Conclusions: A formal consensus process integrating evidence and expert opinion led to a set of 25 core ICF categories for patient-reported outcome measurement in adult traumatic spinal column injury patients, as well as the response scale for use in the future universal disease-specific outcome instrument. The adopted core ICF categories could also serve as a benchmark for assessing the content validity of existing and future outcome instruments used in this specific patient population.

Psychometric Properties of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Set for Spinal Cord Injury Nursing Based on Rasch Analysis

Psychometric Properties of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set: a Rasch Analysis.

Rasch Analysis of the Qualifier Response Options of the ICF Set for Spinal Cord Injury Nursing

The Inter-Rater Reliability of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Set for Spinal Cord Injury Nursing.

Using a Mobile App-Based International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Set to Assess the Functioning of Spinal Cord Injury Patients: Rasch Analysis.

Rasch Analysis of the Body Function Component of the ICF Rehabilitation Set in Functional Assessment of Orthopedic Patients

International classification of functioning, disability and health categories for spinal cord injury nursing in China.

A Multi-Center International Study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, Version IV: Rasch Psychometric Validation

Applying Rasch analysis to transforming scores on the activities and participation component of the ICF Rehabilitation Set: A multicenter study

Simplified Post-stroke Functioning Assessment Based on ICF via Dichotomous Mokken Scale Analysis and Rasch Modeling

Spinal Cord Injury or Dysfunction Quality of Life Rating Scale (SCIDQLRS) (IANR 2022 Version)

An Investigation into the Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III)

Value of Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health for Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment

Translation and Validation of the Chinese Self-Report Version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-SR): Rasch Psychometric Analysis and Online Application

Feasibility of Using Training Cases from International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set for Testing of International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Items.

The social dimension of quality of life following spinal cord injury or disease: an international ICF-linking study

Analysis of Nursing Assessment Terminology for Neurological Conditions and Its Cross‐mapping with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): A Multi‐centre Cross‐sectional Study

Rater Experience Influences Reliability and Validity of the Brief International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Set for Stroke.

Quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury-basic issues, assessment, and recommendations

The selection of core International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) categories for patient-reported outcome measurement in spine trauma patients-results of an international consensus process

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure Ⅱ