Comparison of different anticoagulation methods in perioperative period of pacemaker im-plantation for atrial fibrillation patients receiving long-term warfarin therapy

Ji-hong ZHU,Bing-qiang LI,Yan-yu WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2018.03.025
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the appropriate anticoagulation method during perioperative period of pacemaker implan-tation in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving long-term warfarin therapy.Methods One hundred and ten patients with atrial fibril-lation,who needed to implant pacemakers and received long-term warfarin therapy,admitted to our department from July 2013 to July 2017 were enrolled in the study.Their data were prospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the periop-erative anticoagulation methods:stopped group (n=33),bridged group (n=37) and continued group (n=40).The association of dif-ferent perioperative anticoagulation methods with bleeding and thromboembolic events was analyzed.Results The incidence of bleeding complications,mainly manifested as pocket hematoma,in the bridging group were higher than other two groups(P < 0.05).No throm-boembolic events occurred in the three groups.Conclusion For pacemaker implantation patients with atrial fibrillation who receive long-term warfarin therapy,the preoperative normal anticoagulant therapy does not increase the risk of bleeding complications.However, heparin bridging anticoagulation significantly increases bleeding complications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?