Comparison of Different Antithrombotic Strategies in the Perioperative Period of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Wang Jingfeng,Hanzuremu · Tuoheti,Liang Yixiu,Chen Xueying,Su Yangang,Ge Junbo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6638.2019.04.014
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective The present study aims to assess the risk of intra-procedural and post-operative bleeding undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation under different antithrombotic strategies.Methods From September 2016 to April 2018,a total of 70 patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy and 30 cases on warfarin referred for CIED implantation were studied in Zhongshan Hospital.Patients administrated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were randomly assigned to continuous DAPT group (n=23),aspirin therapy group (n=23) and antiplatelet interruption group (n=24).Those treated with warfarin were randomized to warfarin continuation group (n=14) versus warfarin interruption group (n=16).Intra-procedural bleeding was evaluated by frequency of hemorrhage necessitating hemostasis by clamps or ligatures,and subsequently prolonged operation time.Post-operative bleeding was determined by device-pocket hematoma requiring prolonged hospitalization within one month after the procedure.Results Compared with antiplatelet interruption group,cases in DAPT and aspirin therapy groups required more frequent intra-procedural hemostasis by clamps or ligatures (P<0.05),and subsequently higher incidence of prolonged operation time (52.2% vs.26.1% vs.8.3%,respectively,P<0.01).Significantly more devicepocket hematoma (26.1% vs.4.2%,P<0.05) and longer post-operative hospitalization [(4.26±1.96) dvs.(2.96± 1.08) d,P<0.01] could be observed in DAPT than antiplatelet interruption;while aspirin therapy did not increase post-operative hematoma or prolong hospitalization (P>0.05).More frequent intra-procedural hemostasis by clamps or ligatures (P<0.05) and higher incidence of operation prolongation (50.0% vs 12.5%,P<0.05) occurred in warfarin continuation group,as compared with warfarin interruption group.However,there was no significant difference regarding the incidence of post-operative pocket haematoma (14.3% vs 6.3%,P>0.05) and post-operative hospital day [(3.86± 1.88) d vs (2.88±1.15) d,P>0.05)] between the warfarin continuation and warfarin interruption groups.Conclusion DAPTwas associated with increased risk of intraprocedural and post-operative bleeding during CIED implantation.While aspirin therapy alone or warfarin only increased intra-procedural bleeding.Adequate intra-procedural hemostasis helped to prevent post-operative bleeding complications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?