Abstract:Background: Perioperative nutritional optimization of patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer is important as this population is prone to malnutrition associated with poor outcomes. Nutritional supplementation has been achieved via enteral nutrition through percutaneous feeding tubes such as gastrostomy (G-tubes) and surgical jejunostomy tubes (J-tubes). While they are often routinely placed for patients undergoing esophagectomy, these are associated with adverse events including infections, dislodgement, increased healthcare visits, among others. The morbidity associated with feeding tubes has not been well characterized. We aim to determine factors associated with adverse outcomes after feeding tube placement to guide appropriate use of feeding tubes in esophageal carcinoma patients. Methods: Patients who underwent esophagectomy for carcinoma and had at least one feeding tube placed from November, 2017 to October, 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Subgroup analyses were performed testing for relevant characteristics. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted evaluating outcomes of interest. The primary outcome was the overall rate of tube-related complications. Results: A total of 144 patients were included with 212 feeding tubes placed (75 G-tubes; 137 J-tubes). The rate of any adverse event related to feeding tubes was 39%. Of these, 11% were wound infections, 16% required procedural intervention, 11% visited the emergency department (ED), and 2.5% required admission due to feeding tube-related complications. Factors independently associated with adverse events included smoking history [odds ratio (OR), 2.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-6.23], being female (OR, 2.98; 95% CI: 1.36-6.72), induction treatment (OR, 2.65; 95% CI: 1.14-6.55), and J-tubes (OR, 2.07; 95% CI: 1.09-4.03). Laparoscopically placed J-tubes were associated with increased unplanned admissions compared to those placed via laparotomy (9.4% vs. 0%, P=0.01). Though not statistically significant, there was a trend toward more complications in those who were high risk for malnutrition [body mass index (BMI) <18 kg/m2, weight loss >10%] and comorbid (Charlson Comorbidity Index 5-6). Conclusions: There is significant morbidity related to feeding tubes. The risk profile of these tubes for individual patients should be carefully weighed against the nutritional benefits prior to placement. Patients should be carefully counselled on the possible adverse events and care requirements.

Impact of Transnasal Feeding Tube or Percutaneous Jejunal Feeding Tube on Peri-Operative Nutrition Support in Esophageal Carcinoma Patients

Effects of Perioperative Sequential Treatment on Recovery of Patients with Esophageal or Cardiac Carcinoma

Endoscopic Nasojejunal Feeding Tube Placement in Patients with Severe Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases: a Retrospective Study of 184 Patients.

Clinical application and research of abdominal retrograde gastric and jejunal feeding tube

Modified ( Narrowed ) Gastric Tube and Establishment of Enteral Feeding Pathway in Surgery of Esophageal Carcinoma (Esophagectomy)

Effect of Preoperative Nutritional Risk Screening and Enteral Nutrition Support in Accelerated Recovery after Resection for Esophageal Cancer

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review

Clinical study of different nutrition support for patients with perioperative esophageal cancer

Home Enteral Nutrition's Effects on Nutritional Status and Quality of Life after Esophagectomy.

Effects of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: a Prospective Study

Clinical Outcomes Comparing Parenteral and Nasogastric Tube Nutrition After Laryngeal and Pharyngeal Cancer Surgery

Risk factors contributing to morbidity associated with feeding tubes placed for esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective study

Study for early postoperative enteral nutrition via nasointestinal tube for patients with oral cancer

Effects of Enteral Nutrition on Patients With Oesophageal Carcinoma Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Prospective, Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Study

Effects of enteral nutrition support combined with enhanced recovery after surgery on the nutritional status, immune function, and prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer after Ivor-Lewis operation

Effect of Early Full-Calorie Nutrition Support Following Esophagectomy A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparative Effects Of Different Enteral Feeding Methods In Head And Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherapy Or Chemoradiotherapy: A Network Meta-Analysis

Placement of Laparoscopic Jejunostomy for Patients with Esophageal Cancer

Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition Improves Patient Outcomes after Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Study

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Nutritional Status Between Early and Late Oral Feeding After Esophagectomy

Influence of Enteral Nutrition on Nutritional Status, Treatment Toxicities, and Short-Term Outcomes in Esophageal Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study