Abstract:Background: Perioperative nutritional optimization of patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer is important as this population is prone to malnutrition associated with poor outcomes. Nutritional supplementation has been achieved via enteral nutrition through percutaneous feeding tubes such as gastrostomy (G-tubes) and surgical jejunostomy tubes (J-tubes). While they are often routinely placed for patients undergoing esophagectomy, these are associated with adverse events including infections, dislodgement, increased healthcare visits, among others. The morbidity associated with feeding tubes has not been well characterized. We aim to determine factors associated with adverse outcomes after feeding tube placement to guide appropriate use of feeding tubes in esophageal carcinoma patients. Methods: Patients who underwent esophagectomy for carcinoma and had at least one feeding tube placed from November, 2017 to October, 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Subgroup analyses were performed testing for relevant characteristics. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted evaluating outcomes of interest. The primary outcome was the overall rate of tube-related complications. Results: A total of 144 patients were included with 212 feeding tubes placed (75 G-tubes; 137 J-tubes). The rate of any adverse event related to feeding tubes was 39%. Of these, 11% were wound infections, 16% required procedural intervention, 11% visited the emergency department (ED), and 2.5% required admission due to feeding tube-related complications. Factors independently associated with adverse events included smoking history [odds ratio (OR), 2.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-6.23], being female (OR, 2.98; 95% CI: 1.36-6.72), induction treatment (OR, 2.65; 95% CI: 1.14-6.55), and J-tubes (OR, 2.07; 95% CI: 1.09-4.03). Laparoscopically placed J-tubes were associated with increased unplanned admissions compared to those placed via laparotomy (9.4% vs. 0%, P=0.01). Though not statistically significant, there was a trend toward more complications in those who were high risk for malnutrition [body mass index (BMI) <18 kg/m2, weight loss >10%] and comorbid (Charlson Comorbidity Index 5-6). Conclusions: There is significant morbidity related to feeding tubes. The risk profile of these tubes for individual patients should be carefully weighed against the nutritional benefits prior to placement. Patients should be carefully counselled on the possible adverse events and care requirements.

Clinical application and research of abdominal retrograde gastric and jejunal feeding tube

Effects of Perioperative Sequential Treatment on Recovery of Patients with Esophageal or Cardiac Carcinoma

Clinical significance of postoperative gastrointestinal decompression with enteral feeding tube in elderly patients with gastric cancer

Modified ( Narrowed ) Gastric Tube and Establishment of Enteral Feeding Pathway in Surgery of Esophageal Carcinoma (Esophagectomy)

Clinical study of the gastric tube esophagogastrostomy for esophageal cancer

Clinical Analysis of Feeding Jejunostomy and Optimal Selection of Enteral Nutrients (Report of 238 Cases)

Comparison of Postpyloric Tube Feeding and Gastric Tube Feeding in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Effect of the Gastric Cancer Patients Without Traditional Nasogastric Tube Placement in the Elective Surgery

Impact of Transnasal Feeding Tube or Percutaneous Jejunal Feeding Tube on Peri-Operative Nutrition Support in Esophageal Carcinoma Patients

Comparison of the Efficacy of Indwelling Gastric Tubes in Preoperative and Postoperative Patients With Oral and Maxillofacial Malignancies

The feasibility and safety of early removal of nasogastric tube after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Application value of modified serf-traction Overlap method in intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy of Ivor Lewis surgery

Clinical outcome of using gastric remnant or jejunum or colon conduit in surgery for esophageal carcinoma with previous gastrectomy.

Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Nasogastric Tube placement after Gastrectomy

Placement of Laparoscopic Jejunostomy for Patients with Esophageal Cancer

Study for early postoperative enteral nutrition via nasointestinal tube for patients with oral cancer

Effect of routine jejunostomy tube insertion in esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The Clinical Application of the Nasal Jejunum Nutrition Tube Placement by Transnasal Gastroscope

Risk factors contributing to morbidity associated with feeding tubes placed for esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective study

The nutrition tube placement of Nasal jejunum and observation of the complications of seriously ill patients

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review