Compare the Adequacy between Ultrasound-guided Core Needle Biopsy and Fine Needle Biopsy on the Thyroid Nodules

王丽荟,陈路增,高莹,王彬,张惠,陈铭
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2017.03.003
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the pathologic adequacy of thyroid nodules oBTained by ultrasound guided core needle biopsy (CNB) with oBTained by ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (FNA).Methods From the data of the patients who endure ultrasound guided CNB or FNA were collected retrospectively.The patients were classified into 3 groups by the most biggest diameters of thyroid nodule.A group diameters of nodule>1.0 cm,B group 0.5 cm ≤diameters of nodule ≤1.0 cm,C group diameters of nodule <0.5 cm.Referring to the NCI 2009 Bethesda System for Reporting thyroid Cytopathology,the pathological diagnosis were classified as six categories.Adequacy=(all-category Ⅰ)/all.Results Ultrasound guided CNB was performed to 1279 thyroid nodules,613 nodules were classified into group A,adequacy was 97.9% (600/613).617 nodules were classified into group B,adequacy was 96.6% (596/ 617).49 nodules were classified into group C,adequacy was 91.8% (45/49).Ultrasound guided FNA was performed to 343 thyroid nodules.259 nodules were classified into group A,adequacy was 89.2% (213/259).79 nodules were classified into group B,adequacy was 91.1%(72/79).5 nodules were classified into group C,adequacy was 80.0% (4/5).In group A,group B,group C:adequacy of CNB on the thyroid nodules is higher than adequacy of FNA,group A,group B (P<0.05).Conclusions The adequacy of ultrasound-guided CNB is higher than FNA's significantly in diameters of thyroid nodule larger than 5 mm.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?