Diagnostic value of intraoperative frozen section in thyroid nodule with different Bethesda categories

Jieli LUO,Jianshe CHEN,Yang SUN,Pintong HUANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2017.03.012
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of intra-operative frozen section (FS) in thyroid nodules with a prior ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosis of different Bethesda Categories. Methods: Eight hundred and eighty one nodules from January 2011 to February 2013 were retrospective ana-lyzed in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. All nodules had undergone both preoperative FNA examination and intra-operative FS examination. FNA cytologic diagnosis was classified into six categories based on the Bethesda system and the diagnostic accuracy of intra-operative FS was analysed in different categories of cytology. Results: Among 881 thyroid nodules 57 (6.47%) were classified as Bethesda Category Ⅰ, 95 (10.78%) were classified as Bethesda Category Ⅱ, 65 (7.38%) were classified as Bethesda Catego-ry Ⅲ, Ⅳ, 664 (75.37%) were classified as Bethesda Category V, Ⅵ. 56.14% (32/57) of Bethesda Category Ⅰ were histologically diagnosed as malignant, the precision of FS was 91.23%, 37.89% (36/95) of Bethesda Category Ⅱ were histologically diagnosed as malignant and the precision of FS and FNA were 90.53% and 62.11% respec-tively, 49.23% (32/65) of Bethesda Category Ⅲ, Ⅳ were histologically diagnosed as malignant, the precision of FS and FNA were 87.69% and 50.77% respectively, 97.29% (646/664) of Bethesda Category Ⅴ and Ⅵ were histologically diagnosed as malignant, the precision of FS and FNA was 91.42% and 97.29% respectively. FS di-agnosis was more accurate than FNA diagnosis in Bethesda Category Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ, especially in Bethesda Category Ⅱ (P<0.05), while the accuracy of FNA diagnosis in Bethesda Category Ⅴ, VI was increasing obviously. The ac-curacy rate for dedection of malignancy by FNA was higher compared with the precision of FS in those catego-ries (P<0.05). Conclusion: FNA was an accurate method for evaluating thyroid nodules in Bethesda Category Ⅴ and Ⅵ, while FS do not seem to be necessary in those nodules. Intra-operative FS could be avoided when the FNA results were classified as Bethesda Category Ⅴ and Ⅵ, while FS was most helpful when FNA results are Bethesda Category Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ, which may increase the diagnostic accuracy of thyroid nodules and guide clinical treatment well.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?