Abstract:Background: Advances in imaging have improved the detection rate of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs), but clinical management varies depending on the pathological type of PCNs, and thus accurate differential diagnosis is of considerable clinical significance. We conducted this study to identify the clinical and sonographic features of PCNs with significance for differential diagnosis and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for PCNs. Methods: From January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2022, a total of 100 patients with PCNs who underwent CEUS examination and were confirmed to have PCNs by postoperative pathology in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were included in this study. Results: Of the clinical characteristics of PCNs, age and gender were found to be important differential diagnostic features. Moreover, communication of the lesion with the main pancreatic duct on conventional ultrasound and CEUS images was a critical feature in the differential diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). The size of the lesion, the thickness of the cyst wall and the number of septa in conventional ultrasound images, the uniformity of the cyst wall thickness in CEUS images, and the enhancement pattern in the arterial phase were significant features for the differential diagnosis of serous cystic neoplasm (SCN). Cyst wall thickness and uniformity of the cyst wall thickness in conventional ultrasound images and cyst wall thickness and septa thickness in CEUS images were important features in the differential diagnosis of mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN). The size and internal components of the lesion on conventional ultrasound images, internal components of the lesion, and the enhancement pattern in the arterial phase and rim enhancement on CEUS images were the key features in the differential diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN). Conventional ultrasound combined with CEUS demonstrated significantly greater accuracy than did conventional ultrasound alone in the differential diagnosis of PCNs (66% vs. 79%; P=0.002). Conclusions: PCN types differ in their clinical and ultrasound features. Conventional ultrasound combined with CEUS can better distinguish between different pathological types of PCNs than can conventional ultrasound alone.

The Differential Diagnosis is of Multilocular Cystic Nephroma and Multilocular Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma with Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound

Diagnostic Value of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound for Multilocular Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of complex renal cysts and clear renal cell carcinoma with cystic change

The Comparison of the Images of Multilocular Cystic Renal Cell Neoplasm of Low Malignant Potential on Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Enhanced CT

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential: A retrospective analysis for diagnostic performance study

Application of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Bosniak Classification to the Diagnosis of Cystic Renal Masses

Differential Diagnosis of the Mixed Epithelial and Stromal Tumor of Kidney and Cystic Nephroma with Multi-Detector CT

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Cystic Renal Mass: in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced CT and Conventional Ultrasound

Comparative Study of Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma by Ultrasonography and CT

The Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Benign Cystic Renal Masses

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of cystic renal cell carcinoma

The differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnosis and differential diagnosis of small renal cell carcinoma

How Does Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Influence Bosniak Classification for Complex Cystic Renal Mass Compared with Conventional Ultrasonography?

[Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Renal Cystic Lesion].

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Small Renal Masses: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT

Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography with MRI in the Diagnosis of Complex Cystic Renal Masses

0665: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cystic Renal Lesion

Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Diagnosis of Complex Cystic Renal Mass: Interobserver Variability Based on Different Bosniak Classification Systems

0666: The Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Benign Cystic Renal Masses

Qualitative Assessment of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differentiating Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Oncocytoma