Abstract:PURPOSE:The study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the evaluation of benign and malignant small renal masses (SRMs) (<4 cm) confirmed by pathology. METHODS:A total of 118 patients with 118 renal masses smaller than 4 cm diagnosed by both CEUS and CECT were enrolled in this study, including 25 benign lesions and 93 malignant lesions. All lesions were confirmed by histopathologic diagnosis after surgical resection. The diagnostic imaging studies of the patients were retrospectively reviewed by two independent ultrasonologists and two independent radiologists blinded to the CT or ultrasound findings and final histological results. All lesions on both CEUS and CECT were independently scored on a 3-point scale (1: benign, 2: equivocal, and 3: malignant). The concordance between interobserver agreement was interpreted using a weighted kappa statistic. The diagnostic efficiency of the evaluation of benign and malignant lesions was compared between CEUS and CECT. RESULTS:All the 118 included lesions were detected by both CEUS and CECT. In CEUS and CECT imaging evaluation of the 118 lesions, the weighted kappa value interpreting the concordance between interobserver agreement was 0.89 (95% CI 0.79-0.98) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.99), respectively. Both CEUS and CECT demonstrated good diagnostic performance in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant SRMs with sensitivity of 93.5% and 89.2%, specificity of 68% and 76%, PPV of 91.6% and 93.3%, NPV of 73.9% and 65.5%, and AUC of 0.808 and 0.826, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the diagnostic performance indices between these two methods (P > 0.05). However, the qualitative diagnosis of small papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by CEUS was significantly better than that by CECT (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in qualitative diagnostic accuracy on other histotypes of SRMs between CEUS and CECT (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Both CEUS and CECT imaging modalities are effective for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant SRMs. Furthermore, CEUS may be more effective than CECT for the qualitative diagnosis of small papillary RCC.

0666: The Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Benign Cystic Renal Masses

The Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Benign Cystic Renal Masses

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Cystic Renal Mass: in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced CT and Conventional Ultrasound

0665: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cystic Renal Lesion

[Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Renal Cystic Lesion].

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Enhancement Patterns in the Diagnosis of Adrenal Tumors

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of cystic renal cell carcinoma

Application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of complex renal cysts and clear renal cell carcinoma with cystic change

Contrast enhanced ultrasonography vs.contrast enhanced computed tomography for the diagnosis of focal lesions of the pancreas

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterizing renal masses

Clinical Application Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Renal Space-Occupying Lesions

Diagnostic Value of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound for Multilocular Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma

How Does Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Influence Bosniak Classification for Complex Cystic Renal Mass Compared with Conventional Ultrasonography?

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Renal Pelvic Carcinoma

Application of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Bosniak Classification to the Diagnosis of Cystic Renal Masses

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography in Ureteral Lesions: a Preliminary Study

Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography with MRI in the Diagnosis of Complex Cystic Renal Masses

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Small Renal Masses: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound as a Diagnostic Procedure in Renal Diseases: A Case Report

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Evaluation of Renal Masses with Histopathological Validation—Results from a Prospective Single-Center Study

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Indeterminate Renal Mass, From the AJR “How We Do It” Special Series