Measurement of fat content in vertebral body by magnetic resonance water fat separation

Fei-xia CHANG,Gang HUANG,Dun-hui FAN,Xiang-jiu XU,Xiao-mei MA,Ping WANG,Wen-yi SHEN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2016.12.003
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective:Taking DXA as a reference standard, the use of magnetic resonance (NMR) water and fat separation imaging technology (Dixon) can measure the fat signal intensity and calculate the fat fraction (FF) in order to evaluate the application value of vertebral bone mineral density.Materials and Methods: Thirty-six cases of lumbar vertebral body(L1-L4) (144 vertebral body) in which the patients checked in Gansu Provincial People's Hospital were retrospectively collected. All patients who were performed DXA and MR examination of lumbar spine were divided into normal group(T≥-1.0 SD), osteopenia group (-1.0--2.5SD) and osteoporosis group (≤-2.5SD), according to DXA results and the diagnostic criteria of WHO; At the same time, we measured and calculated the waist 1-4 of the vertebral body signal intensity (T2 fat alike) and fat fraction (FF), Marrow fat formula of FF MRI: FF=[Mfat/(Mfat+Mwater)]×100%(Mwater, Mfat respectively refers to water and lipid like ROI total pixel signal strength value) to evaluate the magnetic resonance (NMR) water and fat separation imaging techniques to predict the ability of osteoporosis.Results:According to DXA results, in a total of 144 vertebral bodies involved 36 patients, 58 subjects were in normal group, 28 subjects were in osteopenia group and 58 subjects were in osteoporosis group. The Fat signal intensity of the three groups (normal group, osteopenia group and osteoporosis group) were 100.2±20.1, 156.1±56.3, 211.9±84.6, and the fat fraction (FF) were (31.1±6.2)%, (53.3±7.6)%, (77.8±7.2)%, respectively. Among osteoporosis group and osteopenia group and normal group, lumbar fat T2 signal intensity and fat fractions were statistically different (P<0.01). When the fat signal intensity negatively correlated with DXA, the correlation coefifcient wasr=-0.64,P<0.01; when the fat fraction (FF) negatively correlated with DXA, the correlation coefifcient wasr=-0.93,P<0.01.Conclusion:Lumbar signal strength and fat fraction through magnetic resonance (NMR) water and fat separation imaging by ROI can relfect the change of the vertebral body fat content in patients with osteoporosis, and is of high value in clinical application. With T value of DXA as the standard, the possibility of having BMD screening for osteoporosis correlation during Dixon check is comparatively high. As a result, it has a certain application prospect to evaluate the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine by simply measuring the fat signal intensity and calculating the fat fraction of ROI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?