Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on evaluation of left ventricular systolic function: compared with echocardiography

Yue ZANG,Jian WU,Xiang-ke DU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2005.07.015
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) and echocardiography on left ventricular systolic function. Methods CMRI and echocardiography examinations were performed on 75 patients suspected with heart disease, and 27 patients underwent left ventricular angiogram. LVEF of each exam was measured and compared. Results In 75 cases, LVEF of CMRI (%) was 42.31±19.70, LVEF of echocardiography (%) was 48.79±17.10, while in 27 cases with left ventricular angiogram, LVEF of CMRI (%) was 35.64±13.36, LVEF of echocardiography (%) was 39.95±12.72, LVEF of left ventricular angiogram (%) was 36.65±14.27, respectively. LVEF of CMRI was lower than that of echocardiography in the same cases (-6.48±12.34,t=-4.544). LVEF of both CMRI (r=0.839, P0.001) and echocardiography (r=0.761, P0.001) was correlated to that of left ventricular angiogram. Conclusion Both CMRI and echocardiography are of great diagnostic value in evaluating cardiac systolic function. LVEF of CMRI is lower than that of echocardiography, and the difference is usually within 10%.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?