Abstract:Background Left ventricular ejection fraction is the single metric that guides therapeutic decision-making, risk stratification and prognosis in patients with severely impaired systolic function. Although cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the current reference standard for quantification of ventricular volume and function, echocardiography is used more often as it is more widely available and less expensive.(1) Aims To evaluate the correlation between CMR and echocardiography in quantifying left ventricular (LV) volume and function and to determine whether these measurements are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Methods Participants recruited to the REVIVED-BCIS2 trial who had undergone baseline CMR or echocardiography were included in this analysis. All scans were analyzed in blinded core laboratories as previously reported.(2,3) All volumes were indexed to body surface area. Spearman correlation, Bland Altman analysis and coverage probability methods were performed to assess the correlation between the two modalities. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association between imaging metrics and the primary outcome, a composite of all-cause death and aborted sudden death. A sensitivity analysis was conducted a priori, restricted to patients undergoing both scans within 60 days of each other. Results A total of 373 participants with paired imaging data were included: mean age 69±9 years, 87% male, BMI 28±5. A moderate correlation was detected for volume measurements between the modalities (end diastolic volume index (EDVI) r=0.66 end systolic volume index (ESVI) r=0.68), with a weaker correlation for LV ejection fraction (EF) (r=0.41). Bland-Altman plots showed moderate agreement in LVEF measurements (Table 1). The sensitivity analysis included 199 patients, and showed similar results (EDVI r=0.72, ESVI r=0.73 LVEF r=0.43, all p<0.000). Only 7.5% of the paired LVEF measurements were within 5% of each other. 30% of participants were misclassified by echocardiography as having an LVEF>35%. (Figure 1) CMR ESVI was associated with the occurrence of the primary outcome (HR 1.05 per 10ml increment, 95% CI 1.00-1.10) however echo ESVI (HR 1.05 per 10ml increment 95% CI 0.99 – 1.10) and all other imaging metrics were not. Conclusion Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction on CMR and echocardiography were only modestly correlated in this population with severe ICM. When using the binary EF threshold of 35% that is commonly used to select patients of implantable defibrillator therapy, almost a third of patients at risk would have been missed by echocardiography alone. The additional insights provided by CMR, including scar burden, further support preferential use of this modality in the assessment such patients.

Screening and Selection of Hypoallergenic Buckwheat Species

The Correlation Study of Left Ventricular Systolic Function Calculated by Automated Cardiac Motion Quantification

Relation of Late Gadolinium Enhancement in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance on the Diastolic Volume Recovery of Left Ventricle with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Relation Of Late Gadolinium Enhancement In Cardiac Magnetic Resonance On The Diastolic Volume Recovery Of Left Ventricle With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (Vol 6, Pg 988, 2014)

Comparative analysis of left ventricle function and deformation imaging in short and long axis plane in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Assessment of Left Ventricle Volume Filling Curve with Magnetic Resonance Imaging: a Preliminary Study

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on evaluation of left ventricular systolic function: compared with echocardiography

The correlation between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography in patients with severe ischaemic cardiomyopathy

Comparison of advanced echocardiographic right ventricular functional parameters with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adult congenital heart disease

[Treatment of the experimental chronic digitalisintoxication by hemoperfusion (author's transl)].

Left and right ventricular strain using fast strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the diagnostic classification of patients with chronic non-ischemic heart failure due to dilated, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or cardiac amyloidosis

Lariophagus distinguendus (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) (Förster)—Past, Present, and Future: The History of a Biological Control Method Using L. distinguendus against Different Storage Pests

The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Qualitative echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve regurgitation with quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance: a comparative study

Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with late-systolic and mid-diastolic cardiac phases using multi-slice computed tomography

13.4km OAM state propagation by recirculating fiber loop.

Comparison of Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography to Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of the Left Ventricle Volumes in Patients Whose Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction More Than 45%

Differences Implying Clinical Decision

The Impacts of Severe Perfusion Defects, Akinetic/dyskinetic Segments, and Viable Myocardium on the Accuracy of Volumes and LVEF Measured by Gated 99Mtc-Mibi SPECT and Gated 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Left Ventricular Aneurysm: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging As the Reference

Enhanced diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in identifying heart failure with preserved ejection fraction through assessment of right ventricular systolic dysfunction

Identifying left ventricular dysfunction using prospective electrocardiogram-triggered coronary computed tomography angiography