Value of SAFIRE for staging gastric cancer

Xiaoyuan GAO,Huan ZHANG,Jing YAN,Fuhua YAN,Zilai PAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16150/j.1671-2870.2015.06.010
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the value of sonogram affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm (SAFIRE) and filtered back projection (FBP) in CT scanning for the staging of gastric cancer. Methods: Forty patients with pathologically confirmed advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. All received CT scanning for preoperative staging of gastric cancer using the dual-source flash CT. The raw data were reconstructed with SAFIRE (grade 1-5) and FBP of slice thickness 5 mm. The image noise and CT value of the gastric lesion, liver, the right erector spinae muscle, subcutaneous fat and abdominal aorta, the CNR (contrast-to-noise ratio, CNR) and SNR (signal-to-noise ratio, SNR) of the lesion, and the SNR of abdominal aorta were statistically analyzed. Subjective image quality and rating of preoperative gastric cancer staging were also eval-uated. Results: There was no significant difference in average CT values measured between FBP and SAFIRE grade 1-5 (P>0.05). The average noise of lesions for FBP was the highest. With the increase of SAFIRE grade from 1-5, the noise, CNR and SNR decreased gradually. In subjective rating, the score of FBP images was the highest, and the score of SAFIRE decreased gradually with increase of grade level; the score of FBP and S1, S2 and S3 were not statistically diffe-rent (P>0.05). Conclusions: Although the use of SAFIRE in preoperative gastric cancer staging could decrease the noise,CNR and SNR of whole image, yet it could not improve the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative gastric cancer staging when compared with FBP. Under conditions of the same scan protocol, FBP or S1 images are preferred for staging of advanced gastric cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?