A clinical study of missed gastric cancer during routine upper GI endoscopy in Jiading District of Shanghai in 2013

Yunlin WU,Junling MAO,Wei WU,Tiansheng HUANG,Min LU,Xiaomin CHEN,Fangxiu LUO,Tingwei LU,Xiaoqin YUAN,You LI,Ming XIANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-2870.2014.04.008
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the missed gastric cancer during endoscopic examinations (24 837) in 5 hospi-tals in Jiading district of Shanghai in 2013. Methods: Repeated upper GI endoscopy was performed by qualified endo-scopists and multiple biopsies were performed. The patients suspected of having gastric cancer underwent surgical opera-tion or endoscopic excision, and those who met the criteria of missed diagnosis were studied and potential causes and medical history within 1 year were analyzed. Results: A total of 297 cases (1.2%) of gastric cancer were diagnosed by biopsy pathology. Ninety-nine patients received surgery in local Jiading district hospitals. Surgical pathology demonstrated 11 cases of early gastric cancer (11.1%), 87 cases of advanced gastric cancer (87.9%) and 1 mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma (1.0%). Eight patients met the criteria of missed diagnosis. These 8 patients received an average of 3.5 sessions of upper GI endoscopy prior to diagnosis, with the previous endoscopic diagnosis of either chronic gastritis or concurrent with intestinal metaplasia. The mean interval between initial consultation and pathologic confirmation of gastric malignancy was 12.5 months. The 8 missed cases were surgically proved, including 4 early gastric cancer without lymph node metastasis (50%), 3 advanced cancer (37.5%) and 1 MALT lymphoma (12.5%). Conclusions: Eight cases (8.1%) are missed in a total of 99 surgically treated gastric cancer patients. The situation of missed gastric cancer is ana-lyzed. Potential causes included the absence of marked lesion, missed judgment of malignancy as benign diseases, and a false negative biopsy. Lack of tumor recognition ability during routine endoscopy screening is the crucial.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?