Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the pathological characteristics of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) specimens for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions, accumulating experience for clinical management and pathological analysis. Methods: A total of 411 cases of early gastric cancer or precancerous lesions underwent ESD. According to the Japanese guidelines for ESD treatment of early gastric cancer and classification of gastric carcinoma, the clinicopathological data, pathologic evaluation, concordance rate of pathological diagnosis between preoperative endoscopic forceps biopsies and their ESD specimens (in 400 cases), as well as the risk factors of non-curative resection of early gastric cancer, were analyzed retrospectively. Results: 23.4% (96/411) of the 411 cases were adenoma/low-grade dysplasia and 76.6% (315/411) were early gastric cancer. The latter included 28.0% (115/411) non-invasive carcinoma/high-grade dysplasia and 48.7% (200/411) invasive carcinoma. The concordance rate of pathological diagnosis between endoscopic forceps biopsies and ESD specimens was 66.0% (264/400), correlating with pathological diagnosis and lesion location (P < 0.01). The rate of upgraded diagnosis and downgraded diagnosis after ESD was 29.8% (119/400) and 4.2% (17/400), respectively. Among the 315 cases of early gastric cancer, there were 277 cases (87.9%) of differentiated type and 38 cases (12.1%) of undifferentiated type. In the study, 262 cases (83.2%) met with absolute indication, while 53 cases (16.8%) met relative indication. En bloc and curative resection rates were 98.1% and 82.9%, respectively. Risk factors for non-curative resection included a long diameter >20 mm (OR=3.631, 95%CI: 1.170-11.270, P=0.026), tumor infiltration into submucosa (OR=69.761, 95%CI: 21.033-231.376, P < 0.001)and undifferentiated tumor histology (OR=16.950, 95%CI: 4.585-62.664, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Several subjective and objective factors, such as the limitations of biopsy samples, the characteristics and distribution of the lesions, different pathological understanding, and the endoscopic sampling and observation, can lead to the differences between the preoperative and postoperative pathological diagnosis of ESD. In particular, the pathological upgrade of postoperative diagnosis was more significant and should receive more attention by endoscopists and pathologists. The curative resection rate of early gastric cancer in ESD was high. Non-curative resection was related to the long diameter, the depth of tumor invasion and histological classification. ESD can also be performed in undifferentiated early gastric cancer if meeting the indication criteria. The comprehensive and standardized pathological analysis of ESD specimens is clinically important to evaluate the curative effect of ESD operation and patient outcomes.

Factors Predictive of Inaccurate Determination of Horizontal Extent of Intestinal-Type Early Gastric Cancers During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Analysis

Clinico-pathologic determinants of non-e-curative outcome following en-bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasia

Pathologic outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasia

Gastric ESD May Be Useful As Accurate Staging and Decision of Future Therapeutic Strategy

Diagnostic Ability of Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging for the Extent of Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Analysis of endoscopic features for histologic discrepancies between biopsy and endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric neoplasms: 10-year results

Characteristics of early gastric tumors with different differentiation and predictors of long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Tumor Size Discrepancy Between Endoscopic and Pathological Evaluations in Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Preoperative evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

The Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography As Further Examination Evaluating the Depth of Invasion of Gastric Cancer

Risk factors for under-diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia and early gastric carcinoma in endoscopic forceps biopsy in comparison with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Chinese patients

Preoperative Imaging Evaluation of the Absolute Indication Criteria for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Early Gastric Cancer Patients

Estimation of Subepithelial Lateral Extent in Submucosal Early Gastric Cancer: Retrospective Histological Analysis.

Diagnostic Efficacy and Decision-Making Role of Preoperative Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Early Gastric Cancer

Discrepancy in Diagnosis of Gastric Submucosal Tumor among Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, CT, and Endoscopic Ultrasonography: a Retrospective Analysis of 93 Consecutive Cases.

[Pathological evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesion in 411 cases]

Predictive Factors Suggesting an Underestimation of Gastric Lesions Initially Diagnosed As Adenomas by Forceps Biopsy.

Is It Possible to Predict the Procedural Time of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer?

How To Diagnose Early Rectal Adenocarcinoma? Endoscopic Features And Predictors Of Submucosal Invasion At National Cancer Center Tokyo

Clinical and Histopathological Features of the Differentiated Type of Early Gastric Cancer with an Unclear Lateral Demarcation

Long-term Outcomes after Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer According to Hospital Volumes in Japan: a Multicenter Propensity-Matched Analysis