A Meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of eplerenone in treatment of hypertension

Jin-ye DING,Fei GONG,Hui-ting WU,Cheng QIAN,Yang-gan WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2016.03.04
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To review systematically the clinical efficacy and safety of eplerenone in treatment of essential hypertension (EH).Methods The databases of PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, WanFang Database and VIP Database were retrieved with computer for searching randomized controlled trials (RCT) of treatment of EH with eplerenone from the time of database establishment up to Sept. 2015. The documents of RCT were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, data was extracted and quality was reviewed by 2 researchers independently, and a Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan5.2 software.Results There were totally 13 documents included involved 3795 cases. The results of Meta-analysis showed that eplerenone reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP,WMD=-8.99 mmHg, 95%CI: -10.62~ -7.37,P<0.00001) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP,WMD=-4.21 mmHg, 95%CI: -5.07~ -3.34,P<0.00001) compared with placebo. Compared with other anti-hypertension drugs, eplerenone was worse than spirolactone (SBP:WMD=6.40 mmHg, 95%CI:6.12~6.68,P<0.00001; DBP:WMD=3.10 mmHg, 95%CI: 2.82~3.38,P<0.00001), was similar to enalapril (SBP:WMD=-0.47 mmHg, 95%CI: -3.12~2.18,P=0.73; DBP:WMD=0.79 mmHg, 95%CI: -0.58~2.16,P=0.26), and was better than angiotensin receptor blockers (SBP:WMD=-3.51 mmHg, 95%CI: -5.20~ -1.82,P<0.0001; DBP:WMD=-2.06 mmHg, 95%CI: -2.97~ -1.14,P<0.0001). The difference in totally incidence of adverse reactions and severe adverse reactions had no statistical significance among all groups.Conclusion Current evidence shows that eplerenone is relatively safe and effective in the treatment of EH.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?