Adverse events associated with early initiation of Eplerenone in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure

Masatake Kobayashi,Akira Yamashina,Kazuhiro Satomi,Ayako Tezuka,Shin Ito,Masanori Asakura,Masafumi Kitakaze,João Pedro Ferreira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132477

IF: 4.039

2024-08-26

International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract:Background The guidelines recommend the initiation or up-titration of heart failure (HF) treatments following an HF hospitalization; however, concerns about adverse events may limit the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Patient profiles or disease severity might impact adverse events associated with MRA therapy in acute HF. Methods The EARLIER trial included patients with acute HF who were randomized to eplerenone or placebo over 6 months. Adverse events ( i.e. , worsening renal function [WRF], hyperkalemia, hypotension, and volume depletion/dehydration) were assessed. HF-related outcome included a composite of all-cause mortality, HF re-hospitalization, investigator-reported worsening HF and out-of-hospital diuretic intensification. Results In 297 patients (mean age: 67 ± 13 years; 73% males), adverse events were observed: 44.4% experienced WRF (>20% drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate[eGFR] and/or investigator-reported WRF), 8.4% had hyperkalemia (potassium >5.5 mmol/L and/or investigator-reported hyperkalemia), 27.9% experienced hypotension (systolic blood pressure[SBP] <90 mmHg and/or investigator-reported hypotension), and 16.8% had investigator-reported volume depletion/dehydration. Eplerenone vs. placebo did not elevate the incidence of these events (all- p -values>0.0 5). Multivariable analyses revealed that, irrespective of treatment allocation, older age (>7 5 years), prevalent diabetes, symptomatic congestion, and microalbuminuria were associated with increased risk of WRF. Baseline eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m 2 and SBP < 90 mmHg predicted hyperkalemia and hypotension, respectively, while older patients were more likely to experience volume depletion/dehydration. However, these patient profiles did not alter the benefit of eplerenone on outcomes (HR [9 5%CI] = 0.53 [0.29 to 0.97], P = 0.04; all-p-for-interaction>0.10). Conclusion Eplerenone did not increase adverse events compared with placebo in acute HF. Importantly, disease severity and comorbidity burden greatly influence adverse events, but not benefit from eplerenone.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems