Efficacy of Suxiaojiuxinwan vs. Isosorbide Dinitratein patients with angina pectoris:a meta-analysis

Wei-wei WANG,Yuan-sheng HUANG,Lin ZHUO,Ren-fei FANG,Si-yan ZHAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.1674-4055.2015.03.03
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy of Suxiaojiuxinwanin comparison with IsosorbideDinitratein patients with angina pectoris. Methods Medline, Embase,the Cochrane library and four Chinese databases including VIP, SinoMed, CNKI and wanfang, were systematically searched from inception through August 31th, 2014 with the keywords including"suxiaojiuxinwan"for patients with angina of coronary heart disease. Relevant information was extracted and data was analyzed using random-effects model. Results 24eligible trials in total were included in our review, involving 1704 cases in intervention groups and 1302 cases incontrol groups. Theoverall incidence of symptom alleviationwassignificantly higher in the patients taking Suxiaojiuxinwanthan IsosorbideDin itrate(OR=2.84,95%CI:2.15~3.76, P<0.05).Significant difference was also found in theelectrocardiogram( ECG)improvement between Suxiaojiuxinwan and IsosorbideDinitrate (OR=1.67, 95%CI:1.35~2.07,P<0.05). Conclusion The efficacy of Suxiaojiuxinwanmay be better than IsosorbideDinitrate in improving symptom and ECG among patients with angina pectoris.Due to probable publication bias and low quality of included articles, the conclusion of the systematic review need to be proved by large-scale clinical trials and comparative effectiveness researchof high methodological quality.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?