Retrospective Analysis of the Appropriate and Inappropriate Shock Characteristics in 134 Patients with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

Ouyang Weina,He Jinshan,Fan Yongmei,Li Xuebin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-5410.2019.04.002
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the appropriate and inappropriate shock characteristics in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), explore the influence factors and their impact to mortality. Methods Checking the medical records and follow up data of 134 ICD patients in Pecking University People's Hospital from January 2001 to February 2015, analyze the time, frequency and reasons of their ICD shocks, and look into their impact on mortality. Results The 134 ICD patients aged 25-82 years, mean (48. 0 ± 19. 2) years old, 90 males ( 67. 2% ), 33 ( 24. 6% ) patients implanted ICD for ischemic cardiomyopathy, 101 (75. 4% ) patients implanted ICD for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. During follow up of (5. 1 ± 1. 6) years, 41 (30. 6% ) patients had appropriate shock therapy and 8 (6. 0% ) patients had inappropriate shock therapy. The most common reasons for inappropriate ICD shocks were atrial fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia, over-sensing and noise. Among the 88 inappropriate ICD shocks, 12 (13. 6% ) of them were due to atrial arrhythmias or supraventricular tachycardia, 56 (63. 6% ) of them were due to noise and 20 (22. 7% ) of them were due to over-sensing. When compared shock group with non-shock group, appropriate shock group with inappropriate shock group, there were no mortality differences between them. Conclusions Inappropriate shocks are common complications after ICD implantations, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial tachycardia, noise from lead fracture, and over-sensing are the common reasons. Either appropriate or inappropriate ICD shocks don??t increase all-cause mortality.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?