Short Physical Performance Battery and Timed Up and Go Test for the Measurement of Muscle Function,Strength and Mass in the Elderly
Ling PAN,Yuan FANG,Lin CHEN,Yong-de PENG,Wen-sha GU,Jin-yu CHEN,Li YOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.02.006
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the value of Short Physical Performance Battery( SPPB)and timed up and go (TUG)test in the measurement of muscle function,strength and mass in the elderly. Methods One hundred and six elderly women whose medical records were complied and maintained in Shanghai Hongkou District Ouyang Street Community Health Service Center from July to October in 2015 and met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. SPPB( tandem standing test,2. 44 - meter walking speed test and 5 times of sitting and standing test)and TUG test were performed in them. The muscle function was assessed by usual gait speed,muscle strength was measured by handgrip strength,and muscle mass was evaluated by calculating relative appendicular skeletal muscle mass( RASM) by dual - energy X - ray absorptiometry( DXA). The correlation between SPPB,TUG and usual gait speed,handgrip strength,RASM were analyzed. Results The mean value of usual gait speed,handgrip strength,and RASM of the 106 elderly women was respectively(1. 32 ± 0. 28) m/ s, (19. 46 ± 3. 91)kg,(5. 94 ± 0. 82) kg/ m2 . Results of SPPB and TUG test showed that the mean time that the women needed to complete the tandem standing test,2. 44 - meter walking speed test,5 times of sitting and standing test,and TUG test was (7. 81 ± 3. 13)s,(1. 83 ± 0. 44)s,(9. 91 ± 3. 06)s,and(8. 96 ± 2. 34)s,respectively. Usual gait speed was negatively correlated with age,BMI,time needed to complete the 2. 44 - meter walking speed test,5 times of sitting and standing test, and TUG test(P < 0. 05). The time needed to complete the tandem standing test had no relation with usual gait speed(P >0. 05). Level of handgrip strength was negatively correlated with age,and the time required to complete the 2. 44 - meter walking speed test(P < 0. 05),but it had no relation with BMI,time required to complete the tandem standing test,5 times of sitting and standing test and TUG test( P > 0. 05). Result of RASM was positively correlated with BMI,time required to complete 5 times of sitting and standing test,and TUG test(P < 0. 05),but it had no correlation with age,time required to complete the tandem standing test,and 2. 44 - meter walking speed test(P > 0. 05). After adjusting age and BMI,the results of correlation analysis demonstrated that usual gait speed was negatively correlated with the time required to complete the 2. 44 -meter walking speed test,5 times of sitting and standing test,and TUG test(P < 0. 05),while it had no relation with the time needed to complete the tandem standing test( P > 0. 05). Level of handgrip strength was negatively correlated with the time required to complete the 2. 44 - meter walking speed test(P < 0. 05),but it had no relation with the time required to complete the tandem standing test,5 times of sitting and standing test,and TUG test( P > 0. 05). The time required to complete the tandem standing test,2. 44 - meter walking speed test,5 times of sitting and standing test,and TUG test had no correlation with the result of RASM(P > 0. 05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that factors influencing the usual gait speed were the time needed to complete the 2. 44 - meter walking speed test(β = - 0. 658,SE = 0. 024,t = - 27. 529,P < 0. 001),and that needed to complete the TUG test(β = - 0. 015,SE = 0. 005,t = 3. 254,P = 0. 002). And the time required to complete the 2. 44 - meter walking speed test was the influencing factor for level of handgrip strength( β = - 2. 422,SE = 0. 835,t= - 2. 628,P = 0. 005). Conclusion Muscle function can be measured by both 2. 44 - meter walking speed test and TUG test. Muscle strength can be evaluated by 2. 44 - meter walking speed test. SPPB and TUG test are of no value in measuring muscle mass,but they can be used as the tools for the measurement of muscle function and strength.