Investigation on the awareness and behavior model of home blood pressure monitoring in urban hypertensive subjects

Jing LIU,Ning-ling SUN,Xin-hua TANG,Ying-qing FENG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16439/j.cnki.1673-7245.2016.05.008
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the awareness and behavior model of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) in hypertensive subjects lived in cities.Methods Convenience sampling was used to collect cross-sectional questionnaires from outpatients at 23 hospitals or community-based clinics in Beijing,Hangzhou and Guangzhou between May 2013 and August 2013.The questionnaires included basic demographic information,history of hypertension and its complications,owning rate and kinds of HBPM devices.Meanwhile,the awareness and behavior model of HBPM,involving the upper limit value of systolic and diastolic blood pressure,time,frequency,and method of measurement were surveyed.Results A total of 2040 questionnaires were issued and 1992 ones were retrieved (response rate 97.8%).Of which,1895 questionnaires had sufficient data.The proportions of cardiovascular risk factors accompanied in this cohort were as follows:22.6% (429/1895) smoking,21.4% (405/1895) with a habit of high-salt intake,28.3% (537/1895) without regular exercise.33.2% (629/1895) subjects complicated with heart diseases,14.6% (276/1895) with cerebral vascular diseases,and 24.9% (471/1895) with diabetes.HBPM devices were owned by 85.2% (1615/1895)subjects and 82.9% (1339/1615) of them were electronic models.78.3% (1048/1339)of these devices were arm-style.4.9% (92/1895) subjects gave an accurate answer on the upper limit value of systolic/diastolic blood pressure(135/85 mm Hg) of HBPM.43.6% (826/1895) subjects considered blood pressure<140/90 mm Hg as the normal value.30.5% (493/1615) subjects measured everyday and about 6.9% (111/1615) subjects never used HBPM despite the devices were available.28.1% (454/1615)subjects used HBPM only when they suffer from a certain symptom.19.6% (316/1615) subjects measured in the morning and at night.33.9 % (547/1615) subjects measured only once each time,52.7 % (851 / 1615) participants never recorded the results of HBPM,and 37.1% (599/1615)subjects never showed the readings of HBPM to the referral doctors.Conclusion Despite the high availability of HBPM devices in family,the awareness and utilizing rate of HBPM are still low,indicating a compelling need for education and training to improve the awareness and behaviors on blood pressure measurement and monitoring in urban hypertensive subjects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?