Evaluation of extent vs velocity of cortical venous filing in stroke outcome after endovascular thrombectomy
Wenjin Shang,Kaiyi Zhong,Liming Shu,Zhuhao Li,Hua Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-023-03146-5
Neuroradiology
Abstract:Purpose: Abnormal venous drainage may affect the prognosis of patients undergoing endovascular reperfusion therapy (ERT). Herein, time-resolved dynamic computed tomography arteriography (dCTA) was applied to evaluate the relationship between the velocity and extent of cortical venous filling (CVF), collateral status and outcomes. Methods: Thirty-five consecutive patients with acute anterior circulation occlusion who underwent ERT within 24 h of onset and successfully recanalized were enrolled. All patients underwent dCTA before ERT. Slow first or end of CVF was considered to occur when the time point of CVF appearance or disappearance on the affected side occurred after than that on the healthy side, whereas an equal CVF, a CVF reduced by ≤ 50%, or by > 50% on the affected side, were considered good, intermediate, and poor CVF extent, respectively. Results: Slow first CVF (29 patients, 82.8%), slow end of CVF (29, 85.7%), and intermediate extent of CVF (7, 20.0%) were not associated with collateral status or outcomes. Poor extent of CVF (6, 17.1%) was associated with poor collateral status, higher proportion of midline shift, larger final infarct volume, higher modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge, and higher proportion of in-hospital mortality. All patients with transtentorial herniation had poor extent of CVF, and those with poor CVF extent had an mRS score ≥ 3 at discharge. Conclusion: Poor CVF extent, as assessed by dCTA, is a more accurate and specific marker than slow CVF to identify patients at high risk for poor outcomes after ERT.