Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with or Without Conduction System Capture in Heart Failure Models
Sijing Cheng,Hui Li,Yiran Hu,Han Jin,Sixian Weng,Pengkang He,Hao Huang,Xi Liu,Min Gu,Hongxia Niu,Minsi Cai,Jianqiu Pei,Liang Chen,Ligang Ding,Wei Hua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.007
IF: 6.124
2024-01-01
JACC Clinical Electrophysiology
Abstract:Background Left bundle branch area pacing includes left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP), which is effective in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure (DHF). However, the basic mechanisms are unknown. Objectives This study aimed to compare LBBP with LVSP and explore potential mechanisms underlying the better clinical outcomes of LBBP. Methods A total of 24 beagles were assigned to the following groups: 1) control group; 2) DHF group, left bundle branch ablation followed by 6 weeks of AOO pacing at 200 ppm; 3) LBBP group, DHF for 3 weeks followed by 3 weeks of DOO pacing at 200 ppm; and 4) LVSP with the same interventions in the LBBP group. Metrics of electrocardiogram, echocardiography, hemodynamics, and expression of left ventricular proteins were evaluated. Results Compared with LVSP, LBBP had better peak strain dispersion (44.67 ± 1.75 ms vs 55.50 ± 4.85 ms; P < 0.001) and hemodynamic effect (dP/dtmax improvement: 27.16% ± 7.79% vs 11.37% ± 4.73%; P < 0.001), whereas no significant differences in cardiac function were shown. The altered expressions of proteins in the lateral wall vs septum in the DHF group were partially reversed by LBBP and LVSP, which was associated with the contraction and adhesion process, separately. Conclusions The animal study demonstrated that LBBP offered better mechanical synchrony and improved hemodynamics than LVSP, which might be explained by the reversed expression of contraction proteins. These results supported the potential superiority of left bundle branch area pacing with the capture of the conduction system in DHF model.