Comparison of three test methods detecting carbapenemases

Hongling MA,Shengda XIAO,Shuaixian DU,Chen LI,Ling MA,Lihua HU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806-b.2018.02.008
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the screening ability of three Carbapenemases detection methods including modified hodge test,Carba NP test and Carbon Penicillium (mCIM) on 23 strains of bacteria resistant to C-type antibiotics,and explore the advantages and disadvantages of each method.Method:Strains were detected using these three methods,and results were recorded and compared.Result:In modified Hodge test,17 strains were positive and the positive rate was 73.9%.The positive rate of carba NP test was 82.7%,19 strains were positive.In mCIM,20 strains were positive,the positive rate was 87.0%.Conclusion:The modified Hodge test might have advantages including simple material,easy procedure,stable result and high positive rate,but spent time might be longer,which could be used to test the result again and also be used in a large number of clinical inpatient specimens.The Carba NP test might have complicated preparation and steps,and high technical requirements for the operator,but its results might be obvious in the shortest 30 min,and the color contrast might be significant,which could be used in the early test of the experiment.The mCIM test might be simple with high coincidence and specificity,and the result might be easy to observe,which could be used for the detection of Carbapenemases in conventional laboratory.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?