Abstract:Objective To explore cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) by placing left ventricular(LV) lead at the latest ventricular electrical activating site mapped in the coronary sinus(CS) branches.Methods Ten patients with moderate to severe congestive heart failure [New York Heart Association(NYHA) functional class Ⅲ or Ⅳ],depressed LV ejection fraction(LVEF) <0.35,and wide QRS complex ≥120 ms were included for implantation of a CRT device.LV activating sequence was mapped in the CS branchs,and the latest ventricular electrical activating site was considered as the target site for LV lead placement.The feasibility and curative effect of this kind of CRT were observed.Results Seven patients were diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy and 3 patients as ischemic cardiomyopathy.The heart rhythm was sinus rhythm in 7 patients and persistent atrial fibrillation in 3 patients.ECG showed left bundle branch block in 9 patients and intraventricular conduction block in the other 1 patient.Electrophysiological mapping were performed in 28 CS branches which were considered as a possible site for LV lead placement and LV lead was successfully placed at the latest LV electrical activating site in all 10 patients.There were 116±28 ms activating time delay at the latest LV electrical activiating site than the QRS onset of ECG.QRS complex were significantly narrowed immediately after CRT than before CRT(121±17 ms vs 153±30 ms,P<0.01).The period after CRT procedure exceeded 3 months in 8 of 10 patients.All eight patients were responders to CRT(8/8,100%)and 3 patients as super responders(3/8,37.5%),the other 1 ischemic cardiomyopathy patient died of acute myocardial infarction 2 months after CRT procedure.The following clinical variables 3 months after CRT procedure were markedly improved than variables before CRT in these 8 responders(all P<0.01).NYHA class was improved(1.6±0.5 vs 3.3±0.5) and the 6-min walk test was increased(405±92 m vs 307±82 m).Echocardiography demonstrated LVEF was improved(0.42±0.06 vs 0.30±0.04),left ventricular end-systolic volume was reduced(121±38 ml vs 153±44 ml) and mitral regurgitation velocity was decreased(3.9±1.2 m/s vs 4.5±1.5 m/s).Conclusions Targeted left ventricular lead placement to the latest venticular electrical activating site guided by electrophysiological mapping in the CS branches was feasible and effective.

The application of orbital implantation of left endocardial electrode for cardiac resynchronization therapy

Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in 20 Cases with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

The clinical effect of quadripolar left ventricular lead in CRT therapy

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Clinical Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

Clinical safety of cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable cardiac defibrillator implantation compatible with magnetic resonance imaging

Management for patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy during perioperative period

Application of epicardial lead for left ventricle pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Clinical application of cardiac resynchronization therapy for refractory heart failure

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Implantation to Improve the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy:Rationale and Design

Cardiac resynchronization therapy by targeted left ventricular lead placement to the latest ventricular electrical activating site mapped in the coronary sinus branches

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block

The application of left ventricular lead implantation and analysis of complications in 110 patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy

The Clinic Effect of Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Heart Failure Patients Selection for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

[Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure].

Atrial Transseptal Left Ventricular Lead Implantation for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Arteriovenous Loop Technique

Retrospective analysis of application of left ventricular active fixation lead in 26 cases

The new choice of medical or cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responders---cardiac contractility modula-tion therapy

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of Heart Failure