Anesthetic Management of Combined Thoracoscopic and Laparoscopic Esophagectomy

徐德军,马少华,王军,吴长毅
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2015.04.002
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To summarize the anesthetic management of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy . Methods Twelve patients underwent combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy under intravenous and inhalational anesthesia .After induction of anesthesia with propofol , fentanyl , and cisatracurium , a double-lumen endobronchial tube was intubated and its position was checked by using fiberoptic bronchoscopy .Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil .One-lung ventilation ( OLV) was performed during the thoracoscopic operation .Values of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), and peak airway pressure (Ppeak) were recorded at following time points: before anesthesia induction , after anesthesia induction , before OLV, 30 min after OLV, and end of surgery. Results The operation was successfully completed in all the patients .The total operation time was (425.7 ±90.1) min and the anesthesia time was (497.3 ±84.6) min.The volume of fluid given intraoperatively was (3020 ±606) ml, including crystal solution (2020 ±527) ml and colloid solution (1000 ±316) ml.Two patients received 400 ml red blood cells.The volume of blood loss and urinary output intraoperatively were (204 ±80) ml and (700 ±231) ml, respectively.The SBP values after anesthesia induction , before OLV, and at the end of surgery were significantly lower than that before anesthesia induction (q=7.607,P<0.05;q=4.890, P<0.05;q=3.713,P<0.05);the MAP after anesthesia induction was significantly lower than that before anesthesia induction (q=5.560,P<0.05).No significant difference was found between values of DBP and HR (F=2.31,P=0.070;F=0.45,P=0.770). The PaCO2 and Ppeak values at 30 min after OLV were significantly higher than those after anesthesia induction (q=5.657,P<0.05;q=8.132,P<0.05), and the PaO2 values at 30 min after OLV were significantly lower than those after anesthesia induction ( q=14.375,P<0.05).A total of 8 cases were given more than one kind of vasoactive drugs .The SpO2 dropped in 4 cases at the beginning of OLV , and recovered after blowing 2 L/min oxygen into the right lung and adding 5 cm H2 O PEEP to the left lung .Nine cases returned to the general ward after operation and 3 cases were transferred to ICU .No postoperative anesthesia-related complications occurred, such as reexpansion pulmonary edema and atelectasis . Conclusions The surgery of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy presents anesthetists with more challenges .Reasonable management skills are essential to ensure anesthetic quality and patient safety .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?