Prognostic Comparison Between Proximal and Distal Gastric Cancer and Analysis of Its Causes

詹文华,蔡世荣,何裕隆,郑章清,彭俊生,陈正煊,黄奕华,汪建平
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2002.01.002
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the difference between proximal and distal gastric cancer (PGC, DGC)in clinical findings and prognosis and analyze its causes.Methods Clinical findings, pathology and periodical follow up data of 365 patients undergoing operation for gastric cancer from June 1994 to June 2001 were inputted into the database and were analyzed in clinical data ,prognostic factors and survival rate. Results There was male predominance in PGC group and no difference in the age between two groups. The incidence of more advanced TNM stages and lymph node metastasis in PGC group were significantly higher than that in DGC group (P 0 05).There were no significant differences in the incidence of Borrmann types and tumor differentiation. The rate of total gastrectomy was higher in PGC group than that in DCG group, but this did not increase surgical morbidity and mortality. The 5 year survival rate in PGC group was lower than that in DGC group(28.4%vs 48.0%, P 0.01).Conclusions The prognosis of PGC is worse than DGC,and the main causes may be later presentation of symptoms and more advanced TNM stages because of special tumor location in PGC group .The poorer prognosis is not correlated with surgical morbidity and mortality.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?