Clinicopathological characterisation of small (2 cm or less) proximal and distal gastric carcinomas in a Chinese population

Qin Huang,Jiong Shi,Qi Sun,Jason S. Gold,Jieyu Chen,Hongyan Wu,Huiping Yu,Yifen Zhang,Hiroshi Mashimo,Chenggong Yu,Travis Manasco,Wenyan Guan,Gregory Y. Lauwers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PAT.0000000000000276
IF: 5.335
2015-01-01
Pathology
Abstract:Clinicopathological characteristics of small gastric carcinoma have not been well defined in Chinese patients. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare small proximal (PGC, n=111) with distal (DGC, n=202) gastric carcinoma in 313 consecutive surgically resected small (≤2cm) gastric carcinomas diagnosed with the WHO criteria. PGC patients were significantly older (average age 63 years versus 59 in DGCs) with a male/female ratio of 3:1. Most tumours were clustered along the lesser curvature (74% in PGCs and 65% in DGCs). Compared to DGCs, PGCs showed a protruded gross pattern significantly more frequently and were significantly better differentiated with a significantly wider histomor-phological spectrum. Surprisingly PGCs were composed of significantly fewer signet-ring cell carcinomas (1% versus 16% in DGCs) but were significantly more deeply invasive, compared to DGCs. Lymph node metastasis was detected in 23% overall, but was significantly less frequent in PGCs (16%) than in DGCs (26%) (p<0.05). However, the difference in survival between the two groups was not statistically significant. Our results demonstrate that in Chinese patients, PGCs display distinct clinicopathological characteristics, compared to DGCs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?