Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT For Lenke 5 patients, posterior selective fusion is widely used to reduce the surgical fusion segments, preserve the range of motion of lumbar spine, and ensure a good correction outcome with the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) at L3 or L4. Previous studies reported that the relative position between LIV and the last touching vertebra (LTV) is a key influencing factor for correction loss and distal superposition, implant failure and proximal junctional kyphosis. However, whether selecting a vertebral body proximal to the lower touching vertebra (LTV-1) as LIV increases the risk of postoperative mechanics-related complications, and whether LTV-1 is selected as a risk factor for LIV remains controversial. PURPOSE To investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the "lower touching vertebra (LTV)-1" as the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) in patients Lenke 5 type idiopathic scoliosis with posterior selective fusion surgery, and to investigate the risk factors for implant-related complications during follow-up. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective study. OUTCOME MEASURES Radiographic parameters and clinical questionnaires. METHODS The patients with Lenke 5 idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior selective fusion and with a minimum of 2 years followup were prospectively recruited in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to distal fusion selection: Group A (LIV at LTV) and Group B (LIV at LTV-1). Group B patients were further divided into Group B1 and B2 according to the occurrence of implant-related complication. Coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters were measured on full-spine X-ray films at pre- and postoperation, and the last followup. SRS-22 questionnaire and mechanical complications were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 103 patients were enrolled in this study (Group A:45; Group B: 58). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, Risser sign, cobb angle at baseline. Both groups showed a high correction rate of the main curvature after surgery (80.6% and 78.7%, p=0.162). Group B showed a higher incidence of mechanical complication with a marginally significant difference (7/45 vs. 12/58, p=0.042). In Group B1 and B2, there were significant differences in trunk shift (C7PL-CSVL) (23.9mm±9.5mm and 14.6mm±11.5mm, p=0.003), LIV tilt (29.2°±3.7 ° and 25.3°±5.3°, p=0.006), and LTV rotation (1.0±0.0 and 0.6±0.5, p=0.002) at preoperation. Logistic regression showed that higher preoperative LIV tilt and C7PL-CSVL were risk factors for implanted-related complications. ROC analysis indicated that when the preoperative LIV tilt was greater than 25.3° or the preoperative trunk deviation was greater than 17.0 mm, there would be a higher incidence of complications during followup. CONCLUSIONS Stopping the distal fusion at LTV-1 and LTV both showed favorable coronal balance and sagittal alignment during a minimum of 2-year followup. Selecting "LTV-1" as LIV in Lenke 5 curve may be sufficient distally and effectively as LTV. However, for patients with a preoperative trunk shift greater than 17.0 mm or LIV rotation greater than 25.3°, LIV selection should be conservative in case of implanted-related complications. FDA Device/Drug Status This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs. For Lenke 5 patients, posterior selective fusion is widely used to reduce the surgical fusion segments, preserve the range of motion of lumbar spine, and ensure a good correction outcome with the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) at L3 or L4. Previous studies reported that the relative position between LIV and the last touching vertebra (LTV) is a key influencing factor for correction loss and distal superposition, implant failure and proximal junctional kyphosis. However, whether selecting a vertebral body proximal to the lower touching vertebra (LTV-1) as LIV increases the risk of postoperative mechanics-related complications, and whether LTV-1 is selected as a risk factor for LIV remains controversial. To investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the "lower touching vertebra (LTV)-1" as the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) in patients Lenke 5 type idiopathic scoliosis with posterior selective fusion surgery, and to investigate the risk factors for implant-related complications during follow-up. Retrospective study. Radiographic parameters and clinical questionnaires. The patients with Lenke 5 idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior selective fusion and with a minimum of 2 years followup were prospectively recruited in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to distal fusion selection: Group A (LIV at LTV) and Group B (LIV at LTV-1). Group B patients were further divided into Group B1 and B2 according to the occurrence of implant-related complication. Coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters were measured on full-spine X-ray films at pre- and postoperation, and the last followup. SRS-22 questionnaire and mechanical complications were evaluated. A total of 103 patients were enrolled in this study (Group A:45; Group B: 58). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, Risser sign, cobb angle at baseline. Both groups showed a high correction rate of the main curvature after surgery (80.6% and 78.7%, p=0.162). Group B showed a higher incidence of mechanical complication with a marginally significant difference (7/45 vs. 12/58, p=0.042). In Group B1 and B2, there were significant differences in trunk shift (C7PL-CSVL) (23.9mm±9.5mm and 14.6mm±11.5mm, p=0.003), LIV tilt (29.2°±3.7 ° and 25.3°±5.3°, p=0.006), and LTV rotation (1.0±0.0 and 0.6±0.5, p=0.002) at preoperation. Logistic regression showed that higher preoperative LIV tilt and C7PL-CSVL were risk factors for implanted-related complications. ROC analysis indicated that when the preoperative LIV tilt was greater than 25.3° or the preoperative trunk deviation was greater than 17.0 mm, there would be a higher incidence of complications during followup. Stopping the distal fusion at LTV-1 and LTV both showed favorable coronal balance and sagittal alignment during a minimum of 2-year followup. Selecting "LTV-1" as LIV in Lenke 5 curve may be sufficient distally and effectively as LTV. However, for patients with a preoperative trunk shift greater than 17.0 mm or LIV rotation greater than 25.3°, LIV selection should be conservative in case of implanted-related complications.

Relationship between lowest instrumented vertebra and sagittal stable vertebra: its influence on the distal junctional kyphosis in postoperative idiopathic thoracic scoliosis

Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Selective Segmental Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion

Selection of the distal fusion level in posterior spinal fusion for Scheuermann kyphosis

Selection of the Optimal Distal Fusion Level for Scheuermann Kyphosis with Different Curve Patterns: when Can We Stop above the Sagittal Stable Vertebra?

Selecting "LTV-1" as the lower instrumented vertebra for Lenke 5 idiopathic scoliosis

Study of distal junctional kyphosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following anterior or posterior selective instrumented fusion and its risk factors

Comparison Between Stable Sagittal Vertebra and First Lordotic Vertebra Instrumentation for Prevention of Distal Junctional Kyphosis in Scheuermann Disease

Selecting the Vertebra above Sagittal Stable Vertebra as the Distal Fusion Level in Scheuermann's Kyphosis: A Prospective Study with a Minimum of 2-Year Follow-Up

Posterior fusion strategy of lowest instrumented vertebra at the apical vertebra of the lumbar curve in Lenke type C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

[Influence of preoperative thoracic kyphosis on the sagittal profile of the lumbar spine in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis following selective thoracic fusion].

Relationship between lower end vertebra, the first lordotic vertebra and sagittal stable vertebra in Scheuermann's kyphosis

Selection of the Lower Instrumented Vertebra in Adolescents with Thoracic Scoliosis Secondary to Chiari Malformation

P107. Selecting “LTV-1” as lower instrumented vertebra in Lenke 5 scoliosis treated with posterior selective fusion

140. Selecting "SSV-1" As Lower Instrumented Vertebra in Scheuermann's Kyphosis: a Prospective Study with a Minimum of 2-Year Follow-Up

The selection of lowest instrumented vertebra for Lenke 1A/2A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Risk factors analysis of proximal junctional kyphosis following posterior long instrumented spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis

Selecting the Last “substantially” Touching Vertebra As Lowest Instrumented Vertebra in Lenke Type 1A Curve: Radiographic Outcomes with a Minimum of 2-Year Follow-Up

Proximal junctional kyphosis in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after selective posterior thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion: risk factors and predictive index

The Impact of the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra on the Correction of the Minor Curve During Selective Fusion in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Incidence and Risk Factors for the Progression of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Following Long Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion

How to Make a More Optimal Surgical Plan for Lenke 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: a Comparative Study Based on the Changes of the Sagittal Alignment and Selection of the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra