A model for predicting survival after decompression and stabilization in lung cancer patients with metastatic spinal cord compression

Mingxing LEI,Yaosheng LIU,Shiguo ZHOU,Chuanhao TANG,Shaoxin YANG,Shubin LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2015.06-008
2015-01-01
Abstract:Beijing 100069;3. Department of Pulmonary Neoplasms Internal Medicine, the 307th Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100071, China) Background:Life expectancy is the most important selection criteria of individualized treatment for patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). However, there has been no report about a model for predicting survival in patients with lung cancer who are operated for MSCC. Objective:To develop a model for survival after posterior decompression and internal fixation in lung cancer patients with MSCC. Methods:Data of 73 consecutive patients with lung cancer who underwent posterior decompression and internal fixation for MSCC between May 2005 and May 2015 were retrospectively analyzed in the study. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to determine whether there was correlation between 11 preoperative characteristics and survival. Cox regression analy-sis was used to choose preoperative variables, and those significantly associated with survival on the multivariate analysis were included in this predictive model. Postoperative functional outcome was further analyzed according to three groups in the model. Results:Cox regression analysis showed that preoperative ambulatory status (P=0.019), the number of involved vertebrae (P=0.001), visceral metastases (P<0.001), and the time developing motor deficits (P=0.012) were significantly related to sur-vival and were included in the predictive model. According to the prognostic scores, which ranged from 0 to 10 points, three prognostic groups were designed:group A (0-4 points, n=31), group B (5-7 points, n=24), and group C (8-10 points, n=18). <br> The corresponding median survival time were 2.8 (95%CI: 1.6-4.8), 6.4 (95%CI: 3.8-7.2) and 14.0 (95%CI: 10.7-20.0) months, respectively, and 6-month survival rate were 13.6%, 59.7%and 100.0%, respectively (P<0.001). In addition, motor function was worse in group A than that in group C (P=0.006). Conclusions:Patients with scores of 0-4 points have the shortest survival time (≤3 months) and poor functional outcome af-ter surgery;radiotherapy or supportive care may be considered in most patients of these patients. Patients with scores of 5-7 points should be surgical candidates because survival prognosis is acceptable (>6 months). Patients with scores of 8-10 points, who have the most favorable survival prognosis (>12 months) and functional outcome, can be treated with radical surgery in order to realize better control of local disease and prevent recurrence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?