Prediction Of Postoperative Ambulatory Status In Patients With Spinal Cord Compression Resulted From Metastatic Cancers

Wenjing Zheng,Mingxing Lei,Guoning Zhu,Le Gao,Ranyun Zhou,Yaosheng Liu
2017-01-01
Abstract:This study aims to create a scoring model with which to predict postoperative ambulatory status and guild surgeons to select the appropriate therapy for patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). We retrospectively reviewed the records of 104 surgically treated patients with MESCC. Twelve preoperative characteristics were analyzed for postoperative ambulatory outcome. Significant factors were included in the scoring model. The c-statistic of ROC curve was calculated to assess the performance of the scoring model. Survival prognosis was also estimated according to the scoring model. The scoring model included four prognostic factors, namely, primary cancer type (P=0.04), preoperative ambulatory status (P=0.02), visceral metastases (P<0.01), and circumferential angle of spinal cord compression (CASCC, P=0.04). The prognostic scores ranged between 3 and 13 points, and three prognostic groups were designed. There were 3-5 points (group A, n=22), 6-8 points (Group B, n=43), and 9-13 points (group C, n=39). The corresponding postoperative ambulatory rates were 40.9%, 69.8%, and 97.4%, respectively (P<0.01), and the corresponding median survival was 4.1 months, 7.3 months, and 9.0 months, respectively (P<0.01). The ROC curve c-statistic for the prognostic groups as a predictor of postoperative ambulatory rate was 0.79. We created a useful scoring model for predicting postoperative ambulatory status in MESCC patients after surgery. Patients with 3 to 5 points who had relatively poor ambulatory outcome and short life expectancy appeared to be best treated with supportive care, patients with 6 to 8 points should be decompressive surgical candidates because the ambulatory outcome and survival prognosis were acceptable, and in patients with 9 to 13 points who had excellent function and survival outcome, more radical surgery should be considered.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?