Correlational study between regional fat content and the bone mineral density in 12285 healthy subjects

Junxiang XU,Zhiyuan QIAN,Guangfei LI,Peng ZHANG,Guangsi SHEN,Huang Xi,Hua LIN,Youjia XU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2014.08.001
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the correlation between the fat percentage around the lumbar vertebrae and the hip and bone mineral density ( BMD) , and to discuss the effect of regional fat content on BMD.Methods A total of 12285 subjects of normal people receiving physical examination were collected.BMD of the lumbar vertebrae and the hip was detected using DEXA.The fat percentage of the trunk and the legs was also detected using local model of DEXA.All subjects were grouped by gender and BMI. One-way analysis of variance and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to analyze the correlation between regional fat percentage and BMD.Results The results of one-way analysis of variance revealed that in groups with higher hip fat percentage, the average BMD was lower.The average BMD of the lumbar vertebrae and the hip in groups with higher trunk fat percentage in males was higher.The average BMD of the lumbar vertebrae in groups with higher trunk fat percentage in females was lower, while no significant changes of the hip BMD were observed.The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that, in female groups, BMD was positively correlated with height ( r =0.276 -0.497 ) and weight ( r =0.216 -0.526 ) , while negatively correlated with age (r=-0.7300 to -0.454), the trunk fat percentage (r=-0.400to -0.245), and the leg fat percentage (r=-0.369 to -0.352 ) .After controling other variables, the lumbar BMD showed no statistical correlation with the trunk fat percentage.However, remarkable negative correlation existed between the lumbar BMD and the trunk fat percentage, as well as the hip BMD and regional fat percentage, which was even more remarkable as BMI rising.Therefore, the negative correlation between the lumbar BMD and the trunk fat percentage was most notable.In male groups, BMD was positively correlated with height ( r=0.139-0.388) and weight (r=0.139-0.388), while negatively correlated with age (r=-0.494-0.077), trunk fat percentage ( r=-0.329 to -0.223 ) , and the leg fat percentage ( r=-0.400 to -0.216 ) .In multiple linear regression models, after controling other variables, the lumbar BMD presented notable positive correlation with the trunk fat percentage only when BMI<20kg/m2(r=0.294).And remarkable negative correlation also existed between the lumbar BMD and the trunk fat percentage, as well as the hip BMD and the regional fat percentage.The negative correlation between the lumbar BMD and the trunk fat percentage was most notable (-0.207 to -0.108) .The negative correlation was decreased along with the increase of BMI.Conclusion Fat content exerts notable influence in BMD.Along with the increase of local fat proportion, BMD decreases significantly.And the correlation is more notable in women with higher BMI index.Fat distribution also has obvious effect on BMD.The negative correlation between the hip fat proportion and the lumbar BMD is most remarkable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?