Comparison of two insertion methods of cannulated screw for treatment of scaphoid fracture

沈鹏程,徐浩,朱立帆,蒋富贵,鞠文,徐能,李晓林
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2017.10.03
2017-01-01
Abstract:[Objective] To evaluate and compare the outcome of scaphoid fracture treated with fixation of cannulated screws inserted from the proximal pole to the distal pole versus the distal to the proximal of scaphoid.[Methods] Forty-eight patients of wrist scaphoid fracture received surgical treatment and were divided into two groups according to screw placement methods,including 23 patients had the fracture fixed with cannulated screw from the proximal to the distal (the PD group),while the remaining 25 patients got the screw inserted from the distal to the proximal (the DP group).The bone healing time,bone healing rate,Cooney wrist joint function score and the DASH questionnaire results were compared between the two groups.[Results] In the PD group 20 patients (86.9%) got bony healing in an average of (10.5±2.85) weeks,whereas in the DP group only 19 patients (76%) obtained osseous healing in a mean of (14.3±1.98) weeks.There were statistically significant differences between two groups in both the healing rate and the healing time (P<0.05).Depending on Cooney score,the results were graded excellent in 11 patients,good in 7,fair in 1 and poor in 1 in the PD group with the excellent and good results rate of 78.26%,while excellent in 9,good in 4,fair in 2 and poor in 4 in the DP group with corresponding rate of 52%,where there were statistically significant differences between the two groups (P<0.05).In addition,DASH questionnaire scores,(7.3±1.28) in the PD group and (9.5±3.24) in the DP group respectively,were significantly different as well (P<0.05).[Conclusion] A cannulated screw inserted from the proximal to the distal of the scaphoid through palmar approach might protect the blood supply more effectively than the reverse insertion technique,therefore achieves better outcome in fracture healing and function recovery of wrist joint after surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?