Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of mesh repair via inguinal approach in acute femoral hernia.Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted.The clinical data of 48 patients with acute femoral hernia who were admitted to Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University between January 2007 and December 2016 were collected.Of 48 patients,29 undergoing hernia repair with polypropylene mesh and 19 undergoing hernia repair with suture were allocated into the study group and control group respectively.All the patients underwent hernia repair via inguinal approach.Observation indicators:(1) surgical and postoperative situations;(2) follow-up and survival situations.Follow-up was performed by outpatient examination and telephone interview to detect complications,hernia recurrence,survival situations at 1-,3-month and 1 year postoperatively for 1 year up to December 2017.Measurement data with normal distribution were represent as x±s and comparison between groups was done by the t test.Comparison of count data was analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability.Results (1) Surgical and postoperative situations:patients in the 2 groups underwent successful incarcerated or strangulated acute femoral hernia repair.There were 3 and 4 patients receiving small bowel resection in the study group and control group respectively,with no statistically significant difference between groups (x2=1.50,P＞0.05).The operation time was respectively (82±16)minutes and (96± 13)minutes in the study group and control group,with statistically significant difference between groups (t =-2.94,P＜0.05).There was no femoral vascular injury in the 2 groups.The time of drainage-tube removal and duration of postoperative hospital stay were respectively (4.5 ± 1.6) days and (9±4) days in the study group and (3.9± 1.3)days and (10±4)days in the control group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (t =1.36,-0.33,P＞0.05).(2) Follow-up and survival situations:all the 48 patients were followed up for one year.No mesh infection was found in the study group.[ncisional infection was detected in 4 and 2 patients of the study group and control group respectively,with no statistically significant difference between groups (x2 =0.11,P＞ 0.05).Patients with incisional infection were cured after incision open drainage.Two and 2 patients had postoperative chronic pain in the study group and control group respectively,with no statistically significant difference between groups (x2 =0o 20,P＞0.05).The 4 patients had mild intermittent pain,without special treatment.There were no seroma occurred in the 2 groups.Hernia recurrence was occurred in 0 aud 5 patients of the study group and control group respectively,with statistically significant difference between groups (x2 =8.52,P＜0.05).There were 2 and 1 patient dead in the study group and control group respectively,with no statistically significant difference between groups (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions Hernia repair with Polypropylene mesh via inguinal approach in acute femoral hernia is safe and feasible.Compared to suture repair,it can not only shorten operation time and reduce hernia recurrence,but also had no mesh infection and cannot iucrease postoperative complications.

Comparison of chronic pain after preperitoneal tension-free hernia repair versus mesh plug repair for inguinal hernia

Assessment of the incidence of chronic pain and discomfort after primary inguinal hernia repair

Clinical control trial comparing self-gripping mesh with biologic prosthetic material in postoperative pain after open inguinal herniorrhaphy

Tension-free repair in the preperitoneal space using modified surgical mesh for inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized study

Tyco Mesh Plug and Preperitoneal Anterior Approach in Tension-free Repair for Inguinal Hernia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Laparoscopic plug removal for chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair using the plug-and-patch technique: A case report

Comparison of postoperative outcomes between tissue glue and suture for mesh fixation in open tension-free inguinal hernia repair: a prospective analytical study

Mesh fixation methods and chronic pain after transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia surgery: a comparison between fibrin sealant and tacks

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia

Clinical value of mesh plug and Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty for recurrent inguinal hernia

Comparison of slit mesh versus nonslit mesh in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair

Chronic inguinal pain post-hernioplasty. Laparo-endoscopic surgery vs lichtenstein repair: systematic review and meta-analysis

The change in groin pain perception after transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with glue fixation: a prospective trial of a single surgeon's experience

Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Short- and long-term outcomes of open inguinal hernia repair: comparison of the Prolene Hernia System and the Mesh Plug method

Propensity score analysis of outcomes between the transabdominal preperitoneal and open Lichtenstein repair techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a single-center experience

Clinical efficacy of mesh repair via inguinal approach in acute femoral hernia

Comparing Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair for Inguinal Hernias: A Focus on Patient Outcomes

Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing partially absorbable lightweight mesh and multifilament polyester anatomical mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Do absorbable mesh sutures cause less chronic pain than nonabsorbable sutures after Lichtenstein inguinal herniorraphy?

Preliminary Outcomes of Inguinal Hernia Repair with Posterior Transverse Abdominis Mesh Placement