Clinical analysis of percutaneous catheter drainage in treating SAP combined with pancreatic necrosis

Da Lei,Yongli Li,Junan Qi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2016.06.017
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of percutaneous catheter drainage in the treating severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) complicated with pancreatic necrosis. Methods From January 2011 to August 2015, clinical data of 98 patients with SAP and pancreatic necrosis were analyzed retrospectively , including 47 cases received percutaneous catheter drainage ( Drainage Group ) and 51 cases underwent open surgery (open group).Statistical analysis were performed by using SAS9.1 software.Measurement data were represented as ( x±s ) and examined by using t test, including acute physiology and chronic health score (APACHE II), CT severity index, WBC, serum amylase, urine amylase, glucose and serum calcium.SIRS incidence, the incidence of organ failure and complication rate were examined by using χ2 test.A P value of <0.05 was considered as significant difference. Results There were no significant difference between drainage group and laparotomy group of WBC, serum amylase, urine amylase, glucose, serum calcium before and after treatment ( P >0.05 ).After treatment, WBC, serum amylase, urine amylase, blood glucose decreased significantly compared with those before treatment in both groups (P<0.05).There was cure rate of 93.62%(44/47) in drainage group and 92.16%(47/51) in laparotomy group, with no significant difference (χ2=0.079, P=0.779>0.05).Postoperative incidence of abdominal bleeding and pancreatic fistula in drainage group was significantly lower than those in laparotomy group (P <0.05). Conclusion For patients with SAP and pancreatic necrosis of <30%, Similar clinical outcome could be achieved by using percutaneous catheter drainage compared with surgical treatment, with less complications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?