Efficacy evaluation of anterior partial Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

陈恕求,孙进,许斌,吴剑平,刘宁,卢凯,尤宗昊,张力杰,张晓文,姜华,杨瑜,柳靖,沙国柱,朱伟东,陈明
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20200820-00612
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the safety and efficacy of anterior partial Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(PRS-RARP).Methods:From November 2018 to November 2019, the clinical data of 123 patients who accepted Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(RARP) was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 55 cases accepted PRS-RARP. 68 cases accepted RARP. The mean age of PRS-RARP group and RARP group was (67.1±6.5) years old and (68.9±6.4) years old, respectively. BMI of two groups was (24.9±5.2)kg/m 2 and (23.4±3.6)kg/m 2 respectively; prostate volume was (48.7±10.4)ml and (46.5±12.2)ml respectively; preoperative PSA of the two groups were (28.2±5.4)ng/ml and (26.6±4.1)ng/ml respectively; there was no significant difference in the above baseline data ( P>0.05). For Gleason score, there were 17 cases in score ≤6 group, 31 cases in score = 7 group, 7 cases in score≥8 group in PRS-RARP group and 22 cases in score ≤6 group, 38 cases in score = 7 group, 8 cases in score ≥8 group in RARP group. For Clinical stage, 14 cases ≤T 2a stage, 18 cases in T 2b stage and 23 cases ≥T 2c stage in PRS-RARP group and 18 cases ≤ T 2a stage, 22 cases in T2b stage and 28 cases ≥T 2c stage in RARP group. There was no significant difference in the above baseline data ( P>0.05). Surgical improvements included preservation of the bladder-peritoneum reflex, median umbilical ligament and medial umbilical ligament, preservation of one side of the pelvic fascia, no dorsal vein complex (DVC) suture and restoration of the integrity of the pelvic peritoneum. The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, complications, incidence of postoperative intestinal obstruction and inguinal hernia, recovery of urinary control, positive rate of surgical margin and PSA level between the two groups were compared. Results:All 123 cases of surgery were completed, without conversion to open surgery. None of the 55 PRS-RARP cases converted to standard RARP. The operative time of PRS-RARP and RARP was (136.9±13.1) minutes and (140.6±9.2) minutes respectively.The intraoperative blood loss of the two groups was (121.5±26.7)ml and (130.9±31.3)ml respectively.The number of cases with positive surgical margin was 5(9.1%)and 7(10.3%)respectively. For the above data, there was no significant difference between different operation methods ( P>0.05). No intestinal obstruction and inguinal hernia occurred in the PRS-RARP group after surgery, while the incidence of intestinal obstruction and inguinal hernia in the RARP group were 4.4%(3/68) and 5.9%(4/68)respectively ( P>0.05). The ratios of urinary control recovery in the PRS-RARP group within 1 month and 6 months were 90.9%(50/55) and 96.4%(53/55) respectively, which was significantly higher than 73.5%(50/68) and 82.4%(56/68) of RARP group ( P<0.05). After 10-22 months of follow-up, PSA was<0.2 ng/ml. Conclusions:Compared with RARP, PRS-RARP might help to restore peritoneal integrity, and prevent the occurrence of operation-related intestinal obstruction and inguinal hernia, and might help the recovery of urinary control.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?