Retzius-sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Improves Early Recovery of Urinary Continence: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Xuefeng Qiu,Youjian Li,Hongqian Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33773-3
IF: 7.6
2020-01-01
The Journal of Urology
Abstract:You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized: Surgical Therapy I (MP19)1 Apr 2020MP19-10 RETZIUS-SPARING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IMPROVES EARLY RECOVERY OF URINARY CONTINENCE: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Xuefeng Qiu*, Youjian Li, and Hongqian Guo Xuefeng Qiu*Xuefeng Qiu* More articles by this author , Youjian LiYoujian Li More articles by this author , and Hongqian GuoHongqian Guo More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000852.010AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) on early recovery of urinary continence compared to the conventional approach of RARP (CON-RARP) for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) including high-risk patients. METHODS: 110 consecutive patients with clinically localized PCa were prospectively randomized in a 1:1 ratio to CON-RARP group (n=55) or RS-RARP group (n=55). Immediate urinary continence rate was compared between each group. Urinary continence rate from 1 to 3 months following surgery was also calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test was used for the statistical comparison. Univariable logistic regressions was used to examine possible predictors of immediate continence following surgery. Intraoperative outcomes, pathologic data and oncologic outcome including positive surgical margin (PSM) and short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with 32.7% in the CON-RARP group, 70.4% men underwent RS-RARP achieved immediate urinary continence (p = 0.000). The relative Kaplan-Meier curves regarding urinary continence revealed statistically better early recovery of RS-RARP when compared with CON-RARP by using log-rank test (p = 0.001). In the Univariate analysis, the Retzius-sparing approach was the only factor significantly associated with immediate urinary continence recovery (p = 0.000). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding complications, PSM, and short-term BCRFS. CONCLUSIONS: The Retzius-sparing approach significantly improves early recovery of urinary continence after RS-RARP without compromising PSM, short-term oncological control and complications. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings and to specifically evaluate possible benefits of RS-RARP in high-risk patients. Source of Funding: None © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e302-e302 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Xuefeng Qiu* More articles by this author Youjian Li More articles by this author Hongqian Guo More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
What problem does this paper attempt to address?