Comparative Study of Single Center Between Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy
Li Zhibin,Zhang Geng,Ruan Dongli,Liu Kepu,Ma Shuaijun,Meng Ping,Zhang Longlong,Yang Xiaojian,Qin Weijun,Yuan Jianlin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2017.02.003
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To comparatively analyze the clinical efficacy and safety between robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN)in treating renal cancer,aiming to investigate the advantages and application values of RAPN.Methods Clinical data of patients undergoing RAPN (n=61) and LPN (n=32) in the Department of Urology of Xijing Hospital between March 2013 and April 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.Age,body mass index (BMI),R.E.N.A.L.nephrometry score,operation time,warm ischemia time,hemorrhage volume,length of hospital stay,postoperative complication and postoperative follow-up status were statistically analyzed and compared between the two groups.Results No significant differences were identified in age,BMI,tumor diameter and warm ischemia time between the two groups (all P>0.05).In the RAPN group,R.E.N.A.L.nephrometry score was significantly higher (P<0.05) and operation time,hemorrhage volume and length of hospital stay were significantly less compared with those in the LPN group (all P<0.05).In the patients with tumor diameter ≤4 cm,no significant differences were documented regard to age,BMI,tumor diameter and warm ischemia time between the RAPN and LPN groups (all P>0.05).In the RAPN group,R.E.N.A.L.nephrometry score was significantly higher (P<0.05),whereas operation time,hemorrhage volume and length of hospital stay were significantly less than those in the LPN group (all P<0.05).In the RAPN group,no significant differences were identified in BMI,hemorrhage volume and length of hospital stay (all P>0.05),whereas age,R.E.N.A.L.nephrometry score,operation time and warm ischemia time significantly differed between patients with tumor diameter ≤4 cm and >4 cm (all P<0.05).In the RAPN group,two patients were complicated with intestinal obstruction after surgery and one was complicated with cerebral infarction.In the LPN group,one case was complicated with acute cerebral infarction (P>0.05).In the RAPN group,two patients had recurrence and metastasis and one died postoperatively.The remaining patients neither diednor presented with disease progression.Conclusion RAPN is an efficacious and feasible surgical technique in the treatment of renal carcinoma,which is superior to LPN.