Fusion of the accessory and primary navicular bones for painful type II accessory navicular bone:16 cases report

Ye HUANG,Song-jie JI,Hui DU,Jian-ming GU,Yi-xin ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2014.06.014
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fusion of the accessory and primary navicular bones for painful type II accessory navicular bone.Methods From February 2009 to December 2012, 16 patients ( 17 feet ) whose average age was 26.9 years old ( range: 17-35 years ) underwent fusion of the accessory and primary navicular bones. The patients complained of local and chronic pain and swelling. The physical examination results showed tenderness in all the patients. The conservative treatment was ineffective.Results The patients were followed up for a mean period of 22 months ( range: 14-60 months ). According to the patients’ satisfaction rating system, the evaluation results of 12 feet were excellent, 4 feet good and 1 foot fair. The postoperative X-rays showed bone consolidation was conifrmed in 13 feet ( 76% ) within 3 months and in 16 feet ( 94% ) within 1 year. One foot of non-union was found in the latest follow-up of half a year after the operation. The preoperative and postoperative talonavicular coverage angles, lateral talo-ifrst metatarsal shaft angles and calcaneal pitch angles were compared based on the X-rays, and the differences were not statistically signiifcant (P>0.05 ).Conclusions Fusion of the accessory and primary navicular bones is a safe and effective method in the treatment of painful Type II accessory navicular bone. Its effects on the function of the tibialis posterior and the progression of lfat feet are still ambiguous, so a long-term follow-up study is needed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?