Significance of pelvic parameters in the evaluation of senile spinal sagittal balance

李淳德,孙浩林,刘宪义,赵耀,邑晓东,刘洪,卢海霖

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2013.02.001

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the value of pelvic parameters in the evaluation of senile spinal sagittal balance through studying the correlation of pelvic parameters such as the sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT) and pelvic incidence (PI) with senile spinal sagittal balance. Methods 26 patients with senile spinal sagittal deformity were adopted by our department from September 2010 to September 2011, including 14 cases of senile degenerative thoracolumbar kyphoscoliosis deformity and 12 cases of senile osteoporotic compression fractures and thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity. Among them, there were 9 males and 17 females, with an average age of 69.2 years old (range;56-79 years). The judgment standard for spinal sagittal balance included: (1) Standing patients who did not need the compensation of double hip hyperextension or double knee flexion could be judged as spinal sagittal balance; in contrast, he or she would be judged as spinal sagittal imbalance; (2) The sagittal vertical axis (SVA) value: patients with the distance between C7 plumb line of spinal sagittal plane on the lateral X-ray and the posteriosuperior corner of S1 was within ±2.5 cm could be judged as spinal sagittal balance; in contrast, he or she would be judged as spinal sagittal imbalance. The consistency and repeatability for judging spinal sagittal balance were investigated. According to spinal sagittal balance, all patients were divided into 2 groups: balance group and imbalance group. The SS, PT and PI of cases in both groups were measured, and independent-samples t test was conducted to compare the differences in SS, PT and PI between the 2 groups. Results The consistency of spinal balance judgment was 92.3% and Kappa coefficient was 0.861; The repeatability of spinal balance judgment was 96.1% and Kappa coefficient was 0.938. There were 14 and 12 cases in the balance group and imbalance group respectively. In balance group, SS was (37±11)°, PT was (22±10)° and PI was (63±13)°; In imbalance group, SS was (26±12)°, PT was (21±13)° and PI was (47±14)°;There were statistically significant differences in SS and PI between the 2 groups (P<0.01), without statistically significant differences in PT. Conclusions Spinal sagittal balance in patients with senile spinal sagittal deformity is correlated with SS and PI, and SS is a major factor, which could be a reference for evaluating spinal sagittal balance and operation strategy.