Continuous lumbar puncture drainage in the treatment of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after superior sacral tumor resection

Yan XIONG,Hong-sheng YANG,Chong-qi TU,Bin ZHANG,Cheng REN,Li MIN,Hong DUAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2013.11.003
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the application effects of continuous lumbar puncture drainage in the treatment of patients with cerebrospinal lfuid ( CSF ) leakage after superior sacral tumor resection. Methods A retrospective and comparative study was conducted to review 72 patients who underwent superior sacral tumor resection and had complete medical records from January 1998 to August 2011. The inclusive criteria were that the patients with dural injuries during sacrum tumor resection had CSF leakage postoperatively, meanwhile excluding those who had contraindications after continuous lumbar puncture CSF drainage such as brain hernia, intracranial pressure increased obviously, skin or soft tissue infection in puncture position, systemic inflammatory response syndrome ( SIRS ) to severe sepsis or septic shock, not cooperating puncture, CSF circulation channel obstruction above L3 etc. 11 patients were in accordance with the inclusive criteria ifnally. 5 patients with CSF leakage after sacrum tumor resection who underwent single drainage using a tube beside the wound before March 2005 were taken as the control group. While the other 6 patients who had CSF leakage after sacrum tumor resection after March 2005 were taken as the continuous lumbar puncture drainage group. The healing time of CSF leakage, the general condition of patients and related complications were compared between the 2 groups. Results No retrograde intracranial infection occurred in both groups, while 1 patient in the control group had local infection of operative incision. The healing time of the patients in the continuous lumbar puncture drainage group was at a median of 14.5 days ( range;12-18 days ), while 25 days ( range;23-36 days ) in the control group, and there were statistically signiifcant differences between them ( P=0.004 ). Less oozing or swelling appeared in the operative incision of the sacrococcygeal region of the continuous lumbar puncture drainage group during the treatment than that of the control group. At the same time, self-feelings of patients in the continuous lumbar puncture drainage group, such as wound pain, dizziness symptoms and so on, were lighter than that of the control group. No patients in both groups had complications such as low intracranial pressure headache, progressive low intracranial pressure, intracranial pneumatosis, cerebral hernia, etc. Conclusions Continuous lumbar puncture drainage can achieve better results than single drainage beside the wound in the treatment of patients with CSF leakage after sacral tumor resection, which can effectively shorten the closure time of CSF ifstula.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?