Abstract:Background and objectives: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious complications after laparoscopic anus-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, which significantly prolongs the patient's hospital stay, leads to dysfunction, and even increases the patient's perioperative morbidity and mortality, and little is known about the effectiveness of anastomotic reinforcement sutures to prevent AL. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of anastomotic reinforcement sutures as a means to prevent AL during laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Methods: A comprehensive and systematic search was performed in the literature database by combining subject and free terms up to 10 October 2023. The overall literature included was integrated and analyzed using Stata 12.0 software and Review Manager version 5.4 software to assess the effect of anastomotic reinforcement sutures on the incidence of AL. Results: A total of 2,452 patients from 14 studies were included, and an integrated analysis showed that the use of anastomotic reinforcement sutures significantly reduced the incidence of AL [odds ratio (OR) = 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.18–0.37; P < 0.00001; I 2 = 0%]. However, the findings confirmed whether or not the anastomosis reinforced with sutures did not affect the incidence of anastomotic stenosis (OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.37–1.32; P = 0.27; I 2 = 0%). We performed subgroup analyses of the results of the study, the randomized controlled studies (OR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15–0.65; P < 0.001) as well as retrospective studies (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19–0.41; P < 0.001), 3–0 sutures (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17–0.45; P < 0.001) versus 4–0 sutures (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13–0.53; P < 0.001), barbed wire sutures (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14–0.48; P < 0.001) versus non-barbed wire sutures (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.46; P < 0.001), interrupted (OR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.20–0.46; P < 0.001) versus continuous sutures (OR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.16–0.51; P < 0.001) to the anastomosis, full-thickness suture (OR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16–0.51; P < 0.001) versus sutured with the seromuscular layer (OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14–0.53; P < 0.001), anastomotic sutured in one (OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14–0.53; P < 0.001) versus non-one circle (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.44; P < 0.001), and reinforcing sutures to the dog-ear area (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14–0.50; P < 0.001) versus the non–dog-ear area (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.45; P < 0.001), which have suggested that there is no significant difference between each other and that all of them reduce the incidence of AL. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that performing reinforcement suturing of the anastomosis during laparoscopic rectal surgery significantly lowers the incidence of postoperative AL but has no significant effect on anastomotic stenosis. It is important to note that further randomized controlled studies are required to confirm this conclusion. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022368631.

The Value of Colo-Anal Anastomoses with Single-Stapling in Surgery Without Abdominal Incision for Rectal Cancer

Clinical Analysis of 9 Cases of a Novel Stent Assisted Intestinal Bypass for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Assisted Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer

The application of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with preservation of anal sphincter for rectal cancer

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Influence of Different Treatment Methods of Left Colic Artery on Postoperative Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer

[Evolution and Prospect of Colorectal Anastomosis].

Double-stapled anastomosis without “dog-ears” reduces the anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled study

Effect of intraoperative anastomotic reinforcement suture on the prevention of anastomotic leakage of double-stapling anastomosis for laparoscopic rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Suspension and Suturing Technique Can Reduce the Incidence of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Excision: a Single, Prospective, Cohort Study

Pancreas transplant graft evaluation using the MIBI scan--a useful tool.

Clinical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for Cancer of the Low Rectum

Effectiveness of anastomotic reinforcement sutures in reducing anastomotic leakage risk after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a pooled and integration analysis

The Clinical Application of Oversleeve Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer

Trans-abdominal coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer located between 4 and 6cm away from the anal verge

Safety and efficacy of left colic artery preservation in laparoscopic anterior resection for lower rectal cancer

The feasibility, safety and short-term clinical efficacy of laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer with left colonic artery (LCA) preservation and natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE)

Robotic purse-string suture technique for intracorporeal anastomosis using double-stapling technique in robotic resection of rectal and sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Association between circular stapler size and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer

Short-term Efficacy Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Laparoscopy for Patients with Rectal Cancer-a Prospective Multi-Center Study

Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection And Eversion Technique Combined With A Nondog Ear Anastomosis For Mid- And Distal Rectal Neoplasms A Preliminary And Feasibility Study

Use of the Circular Anastomosis Stapler for Sigmoid Colostomy