Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques
Jana Steger,Alissa Jell,Stefanie Ficht,Daniel Ostler,Markus Eblenkamp,Petra Mela,Dirk Wilhelm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S335102
2022-05-05
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Abstract:Jana Steger, 1 Alissa Jell, 1, 2 Stefanie Ficht, 3 Daniel Ostler, 1 Markus Eblenkamp, 3 Petra Mela, 3 Dirk Wilhelm 1, 2 1 Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Chair of Research Group Minimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention (MITI), Munich, Germany; 2 Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Clinic and Polyclinic for Surgery, Munich, Germany; 3 Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Chair of Medical Materials and Implants, Garching, Germany Correspondence: Jana Steger, Tel +49 89 4140-5898, Email Purpose: Anastomosis creation after resective gastrointestinal surgery is a crucial task. The present review examines the techniques and implants currently available for anastomosis creation and analyses to which extent they already address our clinical needs, with a special focus on their potential to enable further trauma minimization in visceral surgery. Methods: A multi-database research was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Comparative controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials dealing with anastomosis creation techniques in the intestinal tract in both German and English were included and statistically significant differences in postoperative complication incidences were assessed using the RevMan5.4 Review Manager (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Results: All methods and implant types were analyzed and compared with respect to four dimensions, assessing the techniques' current performances and further potentials for surgical trauma reduction. Postoperative outcome measures, such as leakage, stenosis, reoperation and mortality rates, as well as the tendency to cause bleeding, wound infections, abscesses, anastomotic hemorrhages, pulmonary embolisms, and fistulas were assessed, revealing the only statistically significant superiority of hand-suture over stapling anastomoses with respect to the occurrence of obstructions. Conclusion: Based on the overall complication rates, it is concluded that none of the anastomosis systems addresses the demands of operative trauma minimization sufficiently yet. Major problems are furthermore either low standardization potentials due to dependence on the surgeons' levels of experience, high force application requirements for the actual anastomosis creation, or large and rigid device designs interfering with flexibility demands and size restrictions of the body's natural access routes. There is still a need for innovative technologies, especially with regard to enabling incisionless interventions. Keywords: anastomotic technique, postoperative complications, ideal anastomosis, intraoperative trauma Colorectal resections are performed at a high frequency and for various reasons worldwide, such as cancer or inflammatory diseases. In 2008, there were approximately 2.1 million new diagnoses of colorectal carcinoma globally, 1 with a high percentage of them undergoing surgery, while only for the US, more than 22,000 surgical resections were conducted for diverticular disease in the year 2005 3 in the US alone. Considering all indications, it can be assumed that more than 1 million individuals worldwide undergo colon resection every year. After a bowel segment has been removed, the remaining colonic endings must be reconnected to reestablish continuity and function of the digestive tract. Forming the anastomosis represents the most invasive step of the entire therapeutic intervention and often requires open surgical access. Various techniques to create intestinal anastomoses have evolved, such as hand-suturing, stapling and compression anastomoses, 4,6 but the question arises whether any fully meet our clinical demands, not only today but also with respect to the future. With the development of new techniques and disciplines, such as interventional endoscopy, colonic surgery is also subject to rapid changes that involve an ever increasing reduction of surgical trauma to enhance patient treatment standards. In the age of digitalization and robotics, technology and the invention of new tools will significantly shape this trend. Therefore, there is a strong need for further research on innovative methods. Valid principles and guidelines for the validation of anastomoses in the colon can be derived from the literature. Aside from safety of the anastomosis, which is primarily assessed by the risk of leakage, one can classify techniques according to relevant features, such as reproducibility, associated trauma, complexity, and usability. 7–11 Within the -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services