Abstract:Objective:To assess the clinical application value of tranforaminal unilateral approach for bilateral decompression by comparing the short-term effectiveness of bilateral decompression via unilateral approach of intervertebral foramen with via small surgical incision of bilateral spinous process in lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods:Between July 2014 and June 2015, 48 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis underwent decompression and internal fixation by unilateral approach in 24 cases (trial group) and by bilateral small incision approach in 24 cases (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, disease type, involved segment, combined medical diseases, preoperative level of creatine phosphokinase (CPK), the visual analogue scale (VAS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, hospitalization time, and the incidence of complications were recorded. The CPK levels were evaluated at 1, 3, and 7 days after operation. VAS score and ODI were used to evaluate the effectiveness, and lumbar X-ray film or CT scanning to determine the intervertebral bony fusion.Results:There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization time between 2 groups ( P>0.05), but significant difference was found in postoperative drainage ( t=5.547, P=0.000). At 1 day after operation, the level of CPK in the trial group was significantly lower than that in the control group ( t=3.129, P=0.005), but there was no significant difference at 3 and 7 days after operation between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 17 months). All the wounds healed primarily. Heart failure occurred in 1 case of the trial group, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage and pulmonary infection, and nerve root injury occurred in 1 case of the control group respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between 2 groups ( χ2=0.273, P=0.602). The interbody fusion rate was 95.8% (23/24) in the trial group and was 91.7% (22/24) in the control group, showing no significant difference ( χ2=0.356, P=0.551). No cage sink, dislocation or plate and screw loosening and breakage was found in 2 groups. No adjacent segment degeneration occurred during the follow-up, and there was no change of scoliosis and lumbar sagittal curvature. At 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, the VAS score and ODI were significantly improved when compared with the preoperative scores in 2 groups ( P<0.05), and the VAS score and ODI of the trial group were significantly better than those of control group ( P<0.05).Conclusion:The bilateral decompression via unilateral approach of intervertebral foramen and small surgical incision of bilateral spinous process in lumbar interbody fusion have satisfactory efficacy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis, but the tranforaminal unilateral approach has the advantages of less trauma, avoidance of bilateral muscle stripping and soft paraspinal muscle injury, retention of posterior spinal structure, faster postoperative recovery, shorter hospital stay and good short-term effectiveness.

Short term clinical analysis of long segment and short segment fixation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis

Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Selective Segmental Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion

Posterior-only approach with selective segmental TLIF for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion for severe lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up

Short-term Effectiveness of Transforaminal Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Decompression in Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

A clinical analysis of short-segment fixation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis combined with lumbar stenosis

Comparison of short-segment and long-segment fixation in treatment of degenerative scoliosis and analysis of factors associated with adjacent spondylolisthesis

Posterolateral lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis

[Posterior approach to treatment of spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar scoliosis].

Effectiveness of Short-Segment Fixation versus Long-Segment Fixation for Degenerative Scoliosis with Cobb Angle 20°~40°: A Retrospective Observational Study

Therapeutic effects of long-segment and short-segment decompression fusion internal fixation on degenerative lumbar scoliosis

Radiographic and Clinical Outcome of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Extreme Lumbar Spinal Stenosis of Schizas Grade D: a Retrospective Study

Observation of clinical effects of short segment fixation and single lumbar fusion cage in treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis disease

[Clinical Effects of Different Methods of the Proximal Fusion for Long Segmental Lumbar Vertebrae Fusion in Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis].

[Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Selective Segmental Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis].

[Surgical Treatment for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Associated with Spinal Stenosis].

Operative treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis with scoliosis

An analysis of complications after long-segment versus short-segment ifxation and fusion for adult degenerative

Clinical study posterior decompression combined with different fusion with segmental fixation for treatment of degenerative scoliosis

Long-term clinical outcomes of selective segmental transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Clinical Analysis and Imaging Study of Lateral Lumbar Intervertebral Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis.