Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

郭宝磊,符伟国,郭大乔,徐欣,陈斌,蒋俊豪,杨珏,史振宇,王利新
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2015.08.006
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effect of endovascular repair (EVAR) on ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA).Methods We conducted a retrospective study on 36 RAAA patients undergoing EVAR at our vascular institute between January 2003 and November 2014.Patients with anatomic suitability were treated by EVAR.Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used to predict the risk factors for post-EVAR mortality.Results There were 32 males and 4 females,age at 68 ± 14.Patients' average GAS was (79 ± 19).Perioperative mortality was 27.8%,and the intraoperative mortality was 8.3%.Intraoperative endoleak was found in 9 cases (25%).The overall survival rate was 61.1% during the following-up period (mean 37.9 months).Reintervention rate during 30-day postoperative and follow-up periods was 36.1%.Multivariate Logistic regression analyses demonstrated intraperitoneal rupture (odds ratio,0.143;95% CI 0.030-0.694;P =0.016) and coronary heart disease (odds ratio,0.072;95% CI0.006-0.898;P =0.041) were independent risk factors for the 30-day mortality.Only intraperitoneal rupture was associated with the higher midterm mortality (odds ratio,4.852;95% CI 1.046-22.499;P =0.044).Conclusions EVAR is safe and effective for RAAA patients with anatomic suitability.Coronary heart disease and intraperitoneal rupture were the independent predicting factors for post-EVAR mortality.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?