Abstract:Background: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), currently the preferred treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), has been described also for penetrating aortic ulcers (PAU) of the infrarenal aorta. However, data on its performance in this particular setting are still sparse in the literature. Aim of this study is to compare patient clinical characteristics, aorto-iliac features, and post-operative outcomes between infrarenal PAU and AAA treated by standard EVAR. Methods: In this retrospective observational case-control multicenter study, the patients treated for infrarenal PAU (G1) with EVAR in 2 high-volume European centers from January 2014 to December 2019 were prospectively entered into a dedicated database and retrospectively analyzed. A 4-fold control group (G2) of infrarenal AAA patients, homogeneous for age and gender, was also considered. Preoperative clinical characteristics, aorto-iliac features (rupture, aortic maximum diameter, proximal neck diameter and length, aortic bifurcation diameter, distance between the lowest renal artery and the aortic bifurcation [RA-AoBi], severe aortic calcification), technical success, 30-day (morbidity, reintervention, complications, mortality) and follow-up outcomes (freedom from reintervention [FFR] and survival) were compared in the 2 groups (chi square/Fisher exact test, t-student test, Mann-Whitney test, logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis). Results: Seventy-three patients (age 78 ± 7 years; male 84.9%) were included in G1 and 299 (age 78.4 ± 6.6 years; male 89.3%) in G2. At the time of diagnosis, G1 patients were more often symptomatic compared with G2 (odds ratio OR 10.21, 95% confidence interval CI 4.17-24.99, P < 0.001). At preoperative computed tomography angiography, G1 patients had more ruptures (OR 8.11, 95% CI 3.50-18.78, P < 0.001), smaller maximum diameter (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.08, P < 0.001), longer and narrower proximal neck (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, P = 0.020 and OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.32-1.64, P < 0.001, respectively) narrower aortic bifurcation (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.24-1.45, P < 0.001), lower RA-AoBi (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.07-1.12, P < 0.001), and more severe aortic calcification (OR 57, 95% CI 16-198, P = 0.001). Technical success (G1 98.6% vs G2 95.7% P = 0.320), 30-day morbidity (G1 2.7% vs G2 8.7% P = 0.133), reintervention (G1 2.7% vs G2 2.3% P = 0.691), complications (G1 6.8% vs G2 8% P = 0.737) and mortality (G1 1.4% vs 2% P = 0.720) were comparable in the 2 groups. The mean follow-up was 17.7 ± 16.4 months in G1 and 18.8 ± 15.1 in G2 (P = 0.576). Late FFR and survival were comparable in the 2 groups (1-year FFR: G1 94.8% vs G2 97.5%, P = 0.995; 1-year survival: G1 91.7% vs G2 92.3%, P = 0.960). Conclusions: Infrarenal PAU are more often symptomatic with a higher rupture rate compared to infrarenal AAA. Despite some negative anatomical characteristics (narrower aortic bifurcation, lower RA-AoBi, extensive calcification), the results of EVAR are extremely satisfactory in this setting, suggesting that endovascular exclusion could be considered a valid treatment for infrarenal PAU.

Comparison of Operative Risks in the Infrarenal Aortic Artery Reconstruction Between Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Analysis of the Risk Factors in the Reconstruction of Infrarenal Abdominal Aorta

Operative morbidity and mortality of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: an analysis of 120 cases

Infrarenal EVAR for Penetrating Aortic Ulcer: A Comparative Study with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

[Early Mortality and Complications of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Analysis of 186 Cases].

Prospective Clinical Controlled Study on Endovascular Repair Versus Conventional Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a Chinese Population.

[Clinical data analysis of 117 patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm]

Analysis of High-Risk Factors and Mortality Prediction of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Comparative study of acute kidney injury in pararenal aortic aneurysm: open surgical versus endovascular repair

Surgical Treatment for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in 100 Cases

A comparison of single and double arterial cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass for acute type A aortic surgery: A single center, retrospective observational study

Surgical Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Analysis of risk factors in open operation for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-hospital based experience of 30 years

Clinical Profiles and Surgical Outcomes of Coronary Obstruction Due to Type A Aortic Dissection: a Single Institution Experience

Clinical study of reoperation for acute type A aortic dissection

Early Intervention Effects of Open Repair and Endovascular Aortic Repair on Patients Suffering from 40-54 Mm Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Single Center Experience.

Bilateral Versus Unilateral Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion in Arch Reconstruction for Aortic Dissection.

Comparison of the Outcomes Between Open and Hybrid Approaches in the Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms Repair

Surgical-Treatment Of Atherosclerotic Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic-Aneurysms - A Review Of 30 Years Experience

Short-Term Complications and Mortality Following Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair by a Single High-Volume Surgeon