SanderⅢ and FrankelⅢcorrectional Implement Clinical Efifcacy Comparative Study

LI Xiang-lin,ZHOU Hong,SI Xin-qin,HOU Yu-xia,LIANG Wen-hui,CUI Qiang-qiang,BAO Qing-hong,LI Tong,ZHANG Zhi-yong,WANG Fei
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective Compare the efifcacy of Sander III and FrankelⅢ correctional implement correct Class III malocclusion. Methods From xi 'an jiaotong university stomatological hospital in 2013-2015,random drawing 24 cases of classIII dental patients in orthodontic department outpatient, The patients are divided into two groups: experimental group consists of 12 people wearing SanderⅢ correctional implement 10 months, control group includes 12 people wearing FrankelⅢ correctional implement 12 months.Compare the Pretreatment and posttreatment cephalometric measurement results using Steiner and Tweed analysis method, reoccupy Spss18.0 statistical software matchingt test.ResultsIn two groups ,one wearing SanderⅢand the other wearing FrankelⅢ correctional implement , clinical results show that two groups of Class III malocclusion(teeth, functional and synostosis Class III malocclusion) have been corrected ,to compare the statistics,we found a signiifcant statistical significance (P<0.01) with SNA(°),ANB(°),UI-LI(°),Surface coign (°).Conclusion Both of the experimental group and the control group in the efifcacy of correcting ClassⅢ malocclusion are highly effective;Comparing two grops ifnd that SL distance, face Angle and maxillary anterior teeth forward change obviously, surface type change obviously, and the effect of correcting synostosis Class III malocclusion is good.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?