Abstract:This study aims to identify optimal parameters for using Thulium fiber lasers (TFL) in ureteral stone lithotripsy to ensure laser safety and maximize efficacy. Our goal is to improve the outcomes of single-use semi-rigid ureteroscopy for treating stones located in the proximal ureter. A clinically relevant thermal testing device was designed to investigate heating effects during TFL stone fragmentation. The device was utilized to identify safe power thresholds for TFL at various irrigation rates. Three other devices were used to assess varying pulse energy effects on stone fragmentation efficiency, dusting, retropulsion, and depth of tissue vaporization. Comparative experiments in fresh porcine renal units were performed to validate the efficacy and safety of optimal TFL parameters for semi-rigid ureteroscopy in proximal ureteral stone procedures. Our study found that the improved device generated a higher thermal effect. Furthermore, the safe power threshold for laser lithotripsy increased as the irrigation rate was raised. At an irrigation rate of 40 ml/min, it is safe to use an average power of less than 30 watts. Although increasing pulse energy has a progressively lower effect on fragmentation and dust removal efficiency, it did lead to a linear increase in stone displacement and tissue vaporization depth. Thermal testing showed 20 W (53.87 ± 2.67 °C) indicating potential urothelial damage. In our study of laser lithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones, the group treated with 0.3 J pulses had several advantages compared to the 0.8 J group: Fewer large fragments (> 4 mm): 0 vs. 1.67 fragments (1-2.25), p = 0.002, a lower number of collateral tissue injuries: 0.50 (0-1.25) vs. 2.67 (2–4), p = 0.011, and lower stone retropulsion grading: 0.83 (0.75-1) vs. 1.67 (1–2), p = 0.046. There was no significant difference in operating time between the groups (443.33 ± 78.30 s vs. 463.17 ± 75.15 s, p = 0.664). These findings suggest that TFL irradiation generates a greater thermal effect compared to non-irradiated stones. Furthermore, the thermal effect during laser lithotripsy is influenced by both power and irrigation flow rate. Our study suggests that using a power below 15 W with an irrigation flow rate of 20 ml/min is safe. Moreover, a pulse energy of 0.3 J appears to be optimal for achieving the best overall stone fragmentation effect.

Key points affecting holmium laser lithotripsy efficiency: parameter setting and laser fiber using

Stone Retropulsion Caused by the Pulse-Duration Adjustable Holmium Laser: Analysis of the Whole-Process Dynamics with a Modified Method.

Temperature Changes of Renal Calyx During High-Power Flexible Ureteroscopic Moses Holmium Laser Lithotripsy: a Case Analysis Study

Ablation Efficiency of a Novel Thulium Fiber Laser: an in Vitro Study on Laser Setting and Fiber Usage.

Thermal effect of holmium laser during ureteroscopic lithotripsy

The Effects of Scanning Speed and Standoff Distance of the Fiber on Dusting Efficiency during Short Pulse Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy

Safety of a Novel Thulium Fiber Laser for Lithotripsy: an in Vitro Study on the Thermal Effect and Its Impact Factor.

Assessment of Holmium:YAG, Pulsed-Thulium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers for Urinary Stone Ablation. In Vitro Study

Optimal settings for the Holmium: YAG laser in pediatric endourology: Tips and tricks

Femtosecond laser lithotripsy: a novel alternative for kidney stone treatment? Evaluating the safety and effectiveness in an ex vivo study

Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using holmium:YAG and super‐pulse thulium fibre lasers

Variable Pulse Duration From a New Holmium:YAG Laser: The Effect on Stone Comminution, Fiber Tip Degradation, and Retropulsion in a Dusting Model

High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies

Thermal Injury And Laser Efficiency With Holmium: Yag And Thulium Fiber Laser. An In Vitro Study.

Getting hot in here! Comparison of Holmium vs. thulium laser in an anatomic hydrogel kidney model

Enhanced Treatment Efficiency of Holmium:YAG Laser Lithotripsy by Using PEDOT:PSS Nanofluid

High-Frequency Dusting Versus Conventional Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Intrarenal and Ureteral Calculi

Optimal parameter settings of thulium fiber laser for ureteral stone lithotripsy: a comparative study in two different testing environments

Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser

Do Stone Characteristics and Laser Fiber Size Affect Ho: YAG Laser Time and Energy During Ureteroscopy?

The optimal Holmium laser settings for disintegration of cystine and calcium oxalate monohydrate stones: In vitro study