Novel transurethral laser surgery versus conventional TURBT for treating non-mus-cle invasive bladder cancer:a systematic review and met a-analysis

Kai-jie WU,Li-xia LIU,Jin-hai FAN,Da-lin HE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2015.07.011
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the overall efficacy and safety of laser surgery versus conventional transurethral resec-tion of bladder tumor (TURBT) in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) .Methods Studies on the treatment of NMIBC with laser surgery or TURBT were searched in databases including Google ,Embase ,Pubmed ,Web of Science and Cochrane Library .The pooled data on operation duration ,catheterization time ,hospital stay ,bladder perfora-tion ,obturator nerve reflex ,bladder irritation ,urethral stricture and tumor recurrence were compared .Results A total of 10 studies involving 610 NMIBC cases treated with laser surgery and 667 cases treated with TURBT were included .During the 12-and 24-month follow-up ,there was no significant difference in tumor recurrence rate between the laser surgery group and TURBT group .Laser surgery was associated with shorter catheterization time (P=0 .000 1 ,95% CI :-1 .58~ -0 .51) and hospital stay (P<0 .000 01 ,95% CI :-1 .58~ -0 .72) ,less bladder perforation (P=0 .000 5 ,OR=0 .14 ,95% CI :0 .04~0.42) ,obturator nerve reflex (P<0 .000 01 ,OR=0 .04 ,95% CI :0 .01~0 .12) and bladder irritation (P<0 .000 01 ,OR=0.14 ,95% CI :0 .08~0 .24) ,but there was no significant difference in other variables between the two groups .Conclusion The efficacy of laser surgery is similar to that of TURBT in relation to oncological outcome and operation time ,but it offers several advantages in faster postoperative recovery and fewer perioperative complications over TURBT .Moreover ,much more large-scale and multi-center randomized controlled trials are desired to support our conclusion .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?